Tuesday, November 22, 2005

On the lighter side

Google has recently released an updated version of their Google Earth software. It’s quite fascinating. You can zoom in to near ground level from Six Men’s to Oistins. Not to worry, you can’t see actual people (yet). Maybe these satellite images are straight from Illuminati headquarters. You remember the Illuminati don’t you? The secret reptilian group of alien shape-shifters who secretly run the world. At least that is what David Icke and his beloved band of followers would have us believe. Mind you, this the same David Icke who claimed to be the “son of the godhead.” Really now. It is certainly too late to come to the public with such drivel. Typical of us men to write such nonsense. I wasn’t convinced at first, but maybe it’s true that, “Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good. Luckily, this is not difficult.”

Monday, November 21, 2005

Straight thinking about religion

We enshrine education as a mini-god in our society, but the harsh reality is, we place more emphasis on “getting a piece of paper”, than on intelligent thought and critical thinking. This also applies to how we think about religion in our pluralistic society. All religions, despite some similarities, have irreconcilable differences that cannot be swept under the carpet by any thinking man or woman. The material world cannot be an illusion, as taught in Hinduism and Theosophy, and not an illusion, as taught in Christianity and Judaism, at the same time. Reincarnation and Hebrews 9:27 cannot be both true at the same time. At bare minimum, one of us must be wrong. For the sake of analyzing the argument, it could be that we are all wrong. But one thing that we can never say is that we are all right.

Beliefs may be all equally valid in the sense that they are consciously held by sincere people, but they cannot be equally true in light of irreconcilable differences. Acknowledging that fact is called facing reality, not intolerance. Many “learned” folk insist that one must never insist that “your religion” is the only way. But the very phrase “my religion” is absurd. As G.K. Chesterton put it: “I won’t call Christianity my religion, because I didn’t make it up. God and humanity made it, and it made me.” Christians can respect the concept of religious freedom but we cannot be indifferent to the great commission and the eternal destiny of others. In light of that fact, I want to urge, beg and plead with earnest truth seekers to note Jesus’ words in John 18:37, “Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.”

Article link: Straight thinking about tolerance

One is bound to hear, til one is sick of it, that we must "tolerate" all faiths (whilst ignoring the fact that they all have contradictory claims) and we must not tell anyone they are wrong. Apologetics.com has a good article on this sticky issue of tolerance in a pluralistic society, read more at the source...

Being made perfect through suffering

“The Son of God suffered unto the death, not that men might not suffer, but that their sufferings might be like His” – George Macdonald [Unspoken Sermons, First Series]

It would be amiss to say that Christianity is a bed of roses. The Lord told His disciples, “In the world ye shall have tribulation” (John 16:33, emphasis mine). The Greek translation for tribulation is thlipsis, which can be taken, literally or figuratively, to mean: affliction, anguish, burden, persecution or trouble. Jesus’ message is clear: If you belong to me, you will have trouble in this world. The purpose of this article is to show that tribulation, pain, heartache – call it what you wish – is both necessary and beneficial to the Christian and non-Christian alike. Pain is in fact, one of God’s chief tools in conforming us to the likeness of Jesus. “For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings.” (Hebrews 2:10, emphasis mine)

Every child of God will have some trial or another; but every man who has a trial is not necessarily a child of God (we are all God’s creation, not children; see John 8:44). Afflictions are no proof of sonship, but sonship always ensures affliction. With regards to human pain (generally), we note the following. Pain shatters the illusion that we can continue in an unrepentant state of rebellion, declaring, “All serene!” Until such a man finds evil unmistakably present in his existence, in the form of pain, he will remain blind. Once pain has roused him, he knows that he is in some way or the other “up against” something much more real than himself. He therefore either rebels or makes some attempt at an adjustment, which, if pursued, will lead him to religion. No doubt many of you in the aftermath of natural disasters have heard the ungodly cry: “What sort of God would allow this? What have these “innocent” people ever done?” In this case, pain may lead to final and unrepented rebellion. But it is the only opportunity the ungodly have to begin the process of reconciliation. As C.S. Lewis says, “It removes the veil; it plants the flag of truth within the fortress of a rebel soul.”

The second operation of pain, is that it removes the idea that what we have, is itself, “ours” and enough for us. As someone put it, “We regard God as an airman regards his parachute; it’s there for emergencies but he hopes he’ll never have to use it.” God, who has made us, knows what we are and that our happiness lies in, not outside of, Him. Yet we will not seek Him as long as He leaves us any other resort where it [happiness] can even remotely be looked for. While what we call “our own life” remains agreeable we will not surrender it to Him. What then can God do in our interests but make “our own life” less than agreeable to us. In this age where “no one is wrong”, God’s method here might seem cruel to us. We are baffled as misfortune falls upon “good, decent, hard-working” folk.

How can I say, with sufficient tenderness, what now needs to be said. Our illusion of self-sufficiency must, for our sake, be absolutely shattered. And by trouble, persecution, pain on earth, by the crude fear of eternal flames, God shatters it. This of course seems repugnant to the modern mind. But the modern mind, is, quite frankly; not too bright in divine matters (Isaiah 55:8). Modern people who would like the God of the Bible to be purely ethical, do not know what they ask. If man had to come to God from his own motives, who could be saved? This illusion of self-sufficiency is often at its strongest in the some very “decent”, “kind” and “good” people. On such people, therefore; misfortune must fall. There is an inherent danger in self-sufficiency: why ask for your daily bread, when you own the bakery? This explains why Jesus regards the vices of the feckless and dissipated so much more leniently than the vices that lead to worldly success. The feckless are dissipated are in no danger of finding their present life so satisfactory that they cannot turn to God. The proud, the avaricious, those who are so full of themselves that there is no room for Christ, are in that danger.

Consider the following illustration from Lewis. “I am progressing along the path of life in my ordinary contentedly fallen and godless condition, absorbed in a merry meeting with my friends for the morrow or a bit of work that tickles my vanity today, a holiday or a new book, when suddenly a stab of abdominal pain that threatens serious disease, or a headline in the newspapers that threaten us all with destruction, sends this whole pack of cards tumbling down. At first I am overwhelmed, and all my little happiness look like broken toys. Then, slowly and reluctantly, bit by bit, I try to bring myself into the frame of mind that I should be in at all times. I remind myself that all these toys were never intended to possess my heart, that my true good is in another world and my only real treasure is Christ. But the moment that threat it withdrawn, my whole nature leaps back to the toys: I am even anxious, God forgive me, to banish from my mind the only thing that supported me under the threat because it is now associated with the misery of those few days. Therefore the terrible necessity of tribulation is only too clear. And that is why tribulations cannot cease until God either sees us remade or sees that our remaking is now hopeless.”

One of the unalterable laws of nature and grace is this – all things that are of any value must endure fire. Have you ever seen a precious thing which did not have a trial? Consider jewels. The diamond must be cut (and hard cutting that poor diamond has). If it were capable of feeling pain, nothing would be more “fretted and worried about”, than a diamond. Gold must be tried. It cannot be used as it is dug up from the mine, or in grains as it is found in the rivers. It must pass through the crucible and have the dross taken away. Silver too must be tried. Be sure of this – everything that is precious must be tried. It stands to reason therefore, that God would test (not tempt) His (precious) children.

Most of us are familiar with Abraham’s “trial” in Genesis 22. This raises the obvious question: “If God is omniscient. He must have known what Abraham would do, without any experiment; why then this needless torture?” But as St. Augustine points out (De Civitate Dei xvi, xxxii) whatever God knew; Abraham at any rate did not know that his obedience could endure such a command until the event taught him: and the obedience which he did not know that he would choose, he cannot be said to have chosen. The reality of Abraham’s obedience was the act itself; and what God knew in knowing that Abraham “would obey” was Abraham’s actual obedience on that mountain top at that moment. To say that God “need not have tried the experiment” is to say that because God knows, the thing known by God need not exist. This is of course, utterly out of court.

In the same way Abraham learned obedience though this “trial”, so too Christ. For it is written, “Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;” (Hebrews 5:8, emphasis mine) If you are looking for God’s people, try the furnace (Isaiah 48:10). Remember Noah? There we find a man who was laughed at, considered a fool, a simpleton even! Building a ship upon dry land indeed! Christian, stand firm in the furnace of slander and laughter. History reveals that all of God’s great servants were tried in the furnace: Noah, Abraham, Jacob. All tried and tested. Therefore we should, “count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations; Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience. But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing.” (James 1:2-4, emphasis mine)

We are sent to proclaim “peace on earth, and good-will towards men”, yet we must expect tribulation and ill-will from men. This is the lot of Christ’s disciples. It is through the pain, and heartache of this world that we are made perfect in God’s sight. It is only if we suffer for, and with Christ, that we shall reign with Him.

Jesus on true worship

Jesus’ discourse with the woman from Sychar attests to the fact that God must be worshipped in spirit and truth. “You don’t know what you’re worshiping. We know what we’re worshiping, for salvation comes from the Jews. God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” (John 4:22,24)

Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth: for the LORD hath spoken: “Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;” (Exodus 20:3-5, emphasis mine)

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Don't "debt the malls" this Christmas

“Once again, we come to the Holiday Season, a deeply religious time that each of us observes, in his own way, by going to the mall of his choice” – Unknown

Liz Pulliam Weston wrote an interesting article titled, “5 lessons the rich can teach us.” Some things really stood out in my mind. Whilst the rich do borrow money, it is primarily for mortgages and other real estate related purchases or investments. When it comes to cars, they don’t waste money – period. Although they can splash the cash, they typically opt for cheaper purchases. Of course it goes without saying that those who collect vehicles like the Maybach Type 62, which start at $375,000 “us dollars”, are the exception to the rule. The most noticeable difference is that the rich are much more charitable – they give away a lot of their income – up to 50% or more. 90% in some instances.

The vast majority of us are not “filthy” rich. With Christmas around the corner and all that goes with it; it would therefore be wise to remind ourselves of simple ways we can keep out of the snare of debt. First off, we need to learn the difference between saving and spending. Far too many people have “saved” their way into financial bondage. If an item normally costs $100 and is now on sale for “only” $50; how much money do we save? Nothing. Not $50. We don’t save one red cent. We spend $50 (which we didn’t even intend to spend in the first place). We have to be especially careful with credit cards. They tend to create the illusion that we are not really spending any money (of course this misconception is quickly shattered when the bill arrives). Studies have shown, that people who use credit cards more – even if they pay off the full balance monthly and incur no interest – spend more than if they only use cash. If credit cards are proving to be problematic, as one writer put it, “perform plastic surgery” on them.

We could go on and on, but miss the point. Debt is a sign of a deeper and more spiritual problem (lack of discipline, greed and so on). So, “take heed, and beware of covetousness: for a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things which he possesseth” (Luke 12:15). Not sky-splitting like the second coming, but it’s good to be reminded of the simpler things ever so often. Don’t “debt the malls, spending bills with folly” this Christmas now. Happy holidays.

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

The human element

There is nothing wrong with “the thing” in and of itself. It is the human element. The human element uses (or pursues) “the thing” for either the wrong reasons or in excess. The same money that can be used to produce illegal drugs, can be used to fund medical research for deadly diseases. It isn’t the money, it is the human element – things are morally neutral, people are not. How do you “fight” HIV/AIDS, drugs et cetera? We are missing the mark. If we are going to “wage a war” against anything, it should be ourselves. The Bible teaches that we need a circumcision of the heart and not the flesh. Do not think for one moment, it is mere coincidence that these words come before Jesus’ monumental interview with Nicodemus: “But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.” (John 2:24-25) According to Jeremiah 17:9, what “was in man” is not pleasant at all. Hence Jesus’ dictum in John 3:7, “Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.” Don’t keep missing the mark and forget the human element.

Monday, November 14, 2005

Sabbath keeping

"One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind" (Romans 14:5)

This will be short.

There is a writer who ever so often goes on and on about keeping the Sabbath. Today he has laid down a challenge for readers to "prove Sunday is the Sabbath". Get a life already.

Christian Answers Network has a good article on this issue. Then there's this site, which has some out-dated graphics, but the content is worth sifting through.

But as I said, this will be short. I'm done.

The reality of hell

“The safest road to hell is the gradual one - the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts” – C. S. Lewis

To deny hell is to deny the teachings of Jesus. Hell must be discussed. It has to be. It is one of the chief grounds on which Christianity is attacked. God’s goodness is challenged and Christianity is portrayed as being barbarous. The first thing we must get absolutely clear is this: God wants all men to be saved. Carefully read Ezekiel 33:11 and 1 Timothy 2:4. Keep those verses in mind as you read, or else this discussion will be pointless. This doctrine is attacked on many fronts but let us examine at the strongest one: the idea of hell as positive retributive punishment inflicted by God. Aquinas said of suffering what Aristotle said of shame. The thing is not good in and of itself, but it might have goodness in certain situations. If the eternal happiness of man lies in his self-surrender, then no one can make him surrender but himself. He can be helped towards surrender, but he may refuse. Christianity would love to declare: “Everyone will be saved!” But our reason retorts, “with or without their will?” If “without their will”, then free-will amounts to an illusion and we line up with the false philosophy of determinism. If “with their will”, then what about those who unashamedly refuse to repent of their sins? The proud, the scorners, “lovers of themselves rather than lovers of God.”

If God is truly good, we are told, He must forgive an unrepentant sinner who has no intention whatsoever of surrendering to Jesus. What arises here is a confusion between condoning and forgiving. People are really asking God to condone (not forgive) this behaviour. To condone in this situation would amount to calling evil good. A contradiction of terms. That is not of God. If forgiveness is to be complete, it must be offered and accepted. Therefore, the unrepentant who admits no guilt cannot be forgiven.

God is love, but Hebrews 10:31 is also equally true. There is a fine line between justice and mercy. Therefore, it would be wise if we heeded Jesus’ words, “And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.” (Matthew 10:28) You can recover from many poor decisions in this life; this is isn’t one of them (Hebrews 9:27). Call them scare tactics if you wish. He meant what He said. Only two options. Heaven or hell.

When all is said and done, all of the objections raised concerning this unpleasant doctrine boils down to a question itself: “What more do you want Jesus to do?” To blot out all of our past sins and reconcile man to God, no strings attached? He has already done that on Calvary. “To forgive them?” Some refuse to be forgiven. “Leave them alone then?” That is exactly what He does. He leaves them alone, because as Traherne writes in Centuries of Meditation II, 30: “Love can forbear, and Love can forgive … but Love can never be reconciled to an unlovely object … He can never therefore be reconciled to your sin, because sin itself is incapable of being altered; but He may be reconciled to your person, because that may be restored.” As unpleasant as hell and the images it portrays in Scripture might be, remember this: the same Jesus who taught, “Do unto others…” also warned us of the sufferings of hell. “If it were not so, I would have told you.” (John 14:2)

Thursday, November 10, 2005

The age of the earth: thousands or billions?

There are some things that are so obvious that we do not need expert confirmation. Case in point are the results of a recent study released by the Kaiser Family Foundation. The study revealed that the number of sexual scenes on television has nearly doubled since 1998. Hello? I think we could have figured that one out for ourselves. Now what might be a bit more puzzling is the idea of the age of the earth. No doubt many of you would have watched documentaries where the narrator talks about the age of the earth in billions of years (and with such surety). Of course that is utter balderdash. This has been confirmed by the results of the Radioisotopes and the age of the earth (RATE) project which were recently presented. The RATE project has carefully investigated the method of radioisotope dating (the method that allegedly shows rocks to be millions or billions of years old, a timescale that is crucial if evolutionary theory is to be true). The creation account in Genesis indicates a much younger earth and this fact has now been confirmed. The RATE research draws on some of the best minds in science. The researchers have their Ph. D. in the areas of physics, geology, atmospheric science and geophysics to name a few. They have uncovered powerful scientific evidence which supports a young earth and explains the radioisotope data within a biblical timescale. I would urge interested readers to avail themselves to the material at the Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society.

Eyes on Him

The Christian will no doubt find themselves under more scrutiny than other people as they hustle about their daily business. We are under orders not to judge, but the Lord’s dictum in Matthew 7:20 is clear, “Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” If we say one thing but do another, then those who listen to us are justified in saying to us, “Physician, heal thyself” (Luke 4:23). We cry, “All serene!”, but out works testify against us and our conversion might be largely imaginary. Now the unbeliever should be warned that finger pointing at such hypocrisy is a very weak case. It is no use thinking to yourself – I will stand before the Lord and say, “Look, John Doe called himself a Christian but he was a hypocrite.” Do not be fooled. For now, the “wheat” and the “tares” will grow together, until the harvest. Until the harvest, some will profess but not possess the faith. Spurgeon aptly described these frauds: “I remember one who was very saintly in his talk. I will call him John Fairspeech. Oh, how cunningly he could act the hypocrite, getting among our young men and leading them into all manner of sin and iniquity; yet he would call to see me and have a half hour of spiritual conversation!” Some use the title of Christian yet they bring the utmost shame to the name of Christ. Therefore, fix your eyes solely on Jesus, not man.

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Thousands... not billions

No doubt many of you would have heard "scientists" talking about the age of the earth and various species in billions of years. Well, Answers in Genesis has a great resource that thoroughly shatters this falsity. Read more about it here...

More information about the RATE project can be found at:


Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Embryonic stem cell research - is it ethical?

I would like to raise some concerns surrounding the ethics concerning embryonic stem cell research (ESCR). Are you against Embryonic Stem Cell Research (ESCR)? I say no, IF… if it doesn’t kill an innocent human being. We certainly should explore all scientific avenues that might provide cures and we need to care deeply for the sick, not just in word but also in action. Yet the facts of science are stubborn: embryonic stem cell research always kills a human being in the embryonic stage when researchers remove the stem cells. We can only derive human embryonic stem cells by killing the embryo. Removing its stem cells leaves it with no cells from which to build the organs of its body. The entire moral question surrounding ESCR essentially boils down to this: are the embryos human? If the embryo is a human, killing her to benefit someone in the “here-and-now” is a serious moral wrong.

As in the case of abortion, let’s be careful of the language used in ESCR, since we must be clear about what ESCR actually does. Before abortion was legalized in America, a pro-choice advocate instructed nurses in a prominent medical journal, “Through public conditioning, use of language, concepts and laws, the idea of abortion can be separated from the idea of killing.” Regarding ESCR, there has been a consorted attempt to do the same thing – to separate ESCR from killing. Some say the blastocyst (an embryo at an early stage of development) is morally different from the other stages of human development. Here’s the picture some paint: in the first case you do not have a human being but in subsequent stages you do. Proponents of ESCR will say that it (blastula) is not a human being; it is “just an embryo”. Excuse me? “An embryo”? Think about it ladies and gentlemen, there is no such thing as “an embryo” in the abstract. Embryo is a stage of an organism, not a type of organism (big difference). To say “an embryo” doesn’t tell us what kind of thing it is. It could be a young squirrel, fish, or a human. The terms embryo and blastocyst only describe the earliest stages of development. They give us no information about the thing that is being developed.

ESCR proponents often appeal to emotion and it’s seriously flawed. American Senator Tom Harkin argues, “the embryos in question are no bigger than the period at the end of a sentence. They do not have the capacity to become a human being. It is morally wrong to oppose funding.” Mary Tyler Moore, who suffers from juvenile diabetes, shares a similar view, “The embryos that are being discussed, according to science, bear as much resemblance to a human being as a gold fish. We’re dealing with flesh and blood people now who feel and deal with real debilitation right now are our obligation is to those who are here.”

The point? “The embryo doesn’t look like us, therefore it’s not one of us”. But the issue is not what a human being in the embryonic stage looks like. The issue is this: it’s a human being. Don’t all human beings have intrinsic value and shouldn’t all human beings be treated equally? As Scott Klusendorf [www.str.org] points out in, “Harvesting the Unborn: The Ethics of Embryo Stem Cell Research”, this logic violates the very principle that once made political liberalism great: the concern for the oppressed, weak and defenseless. Proponents of ESCR believe that human beings at the embryonic stage do not deserve the protection of law. But can we really exclude the embryo from the moral community of human beings simply because of size, level of development or place of residence (womb, house or Petri dish)? Whatever happened to “Do unto others?”

Monday, November 07, 2005

Vices have become virtues

It does not need to be restated for the umpteenth time that something is desperately wrong with our society. But should we expect anything different? We glorify every vice imaginable and ridicule every virtue. Vices have become virtues and vice versa. “Entertainers” who name themselves after spare change and “roll with a unit” named after the seventh letter of the alphabet are glorified. Sin is flowing like a river because all manner of evil masquerades under the guise of high-sounding empty words (“political correctness”). We should soberly remember the judgement pronounced for this type of behaviour – “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20). We shouldn’t bow down because we are afraid we will be consumed by the flames of popular opinion. If the majority of people do or believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Charles Spurgeon book excerpt

“The fruit of the righteous is a tree of life; and he that winneth souls is wise” (Proverbs 11:30)

These are some of my favourite excerpts from “The Soul Winner” by Charles Spurgeon:

Suppose it were well known that, if men were only clever, God would use them, no matter what their character and conduct might be. Suppose it were understood that you could get on as well in the word of God by chicanery and untruthfulness as by honest and uprightness. What person in the world, with any right feeling, would not be ashamed of such a state of affairs? But, beloved, it is not so.


He delights especially in humility among His followers. It is an awful sight to see a proud Christian. There are few things that can give the devil more joy than this sight, whenever he takes his walks abroad. He delights in a proud Christian, and he says to himself, “Here are all the preparations for a great fall before long.” Some pastors show their pride by their style in the pulpit. You can never forget the way in which they announced their text, “It is I: be not afraid” (John 6:20). Others manifest it in their attire, in the vanity of their dress, or in their talk, in which they continually magnify others’ deficiencies and amplify their own excellencies.


The third thing in a message that is likely to win souls to Christ is that it must be instructive. If people are to be saved by a message, it must contain at least some measure of knowledge. There must be light as well as fire. Some preachers are all light and no fire, and others are all fire and no light. What we need is both light and fire. I do not judge those men who are all fire and fury, but I wish they had a little more knowledge of what they talk about, and I think it would be well if they did not begin to preach quite so soon that they hardly understand themselves. It is a fine thing to stand up in the street and cry out, “Believe! Believe! Believe!” Yes, my dear soul, but what are we to believe? What is all this noise about?


First, we must work at our preaching. You are not distrustful of the use of preaching, are you? I hope you do not weary of it, though you certainly sometimes must weary in it. Cobbler, stick to your trade; preacher stick to your preaching.



You who have a delicacy and refinement may have to be shocked into the power to benefit the coarse and ignorant. You who are wise and educated may have to be made fools of, so that you may win fools to Jesus. Fools need saving, and many of them will not be saved except by means that men of culture cannot admire.


We ought not to regard the Christian church as a luxurious hotel where each Christian may dwell at his own ease in his own inn, but as barracks in which soldiers are drilled and trained for war. We should not regard the Christian church as an association for mutual admiration and comfort, but as an army with banners, marching to the fray to achieve victories for Christ, to storm the strongholds of the foe, and to add province after province to the Redeemer’s kingdom.


I have known several like a young man whom I will call Charley Clever, who were uncommonly clever young fellows at anything and everything, very clever at counterfeiting religion when they took up with it. They prayed very fluently. They tried to preach and did it very well. Whatever they did, they did it with ease. It was as easy to them as kissing their hand … Do not be in a hurry to take such people into the church. They have no humiliation on account of sin, no brokenness of heart, no sense of divine grace. They cry, “All serene!” and away they go; but you will find that they will never repay you for your labour and trouble. They will be able to use the language of God’s people as well as the best of His saints. They will even talk of their doubts and fears and will work up a deep experience in five minutes. They are a little too clever and are likely to do much harm when they get into the church, so keep them out, if you possibly can … I remember one who was very saintly in his talk. I will call him John Fairspeech. Oh, how cunningly he could act the hypocrite, getting among our young men and leading them into all manner of sin and iniquity; yet he would call to see me and have a half hour of spiritual conversation! An abominable wretch, he was living in open sin at the very time that he was seeking to come to the Lord’s table, joining our societies, and anxious to be a leading man in every good work. Keep your watchful eye open, friends! … They will come to you with money in their hands, like Peter’s fish with the silver in its mouth, and they will be so helpful in the work. They speak so softly and are such perfect gentlemen! Yes, I believe Judas was a man exactly of that kind, very clever at deceiving those around him. We must guard that we do not get any of these into the church; we must try to keep them out by any means.

Great soul-winners never have been fools. A person whom God qualifies to win souls could probably do anything else that Providence might allot him. Take Martin Luther, for instance. The man was not only fit to work a Reformation, but he could have ruled a nation or commanded an army! Think of Whitfield. His thundering eloquence, which stirred all England, was not associated with weak judgement or an absence of brain power; the man was a master orator. If he had applied himself to commerce, he would have become a leading merchant. If he had been a politician, he would have commanded the listeners amid admiring senates. He who wins souls is usually a man who could have done anything else if God had called him to it.


There is a way, too, of winning souls by laying hands upon heads, only the elbows of the aforesaid hands must be encased in sheer linen. Then the machinery acts, and grace is conferred by blessed fingers! I do not understand the mysterious science. But at this I need not wonder, for the profession of saving souls by such juggling can be carried out only by certain favoured persons who have received apostolic succession directly from Judas Iscariot. This confirmation, when men pretend that it confers grace, is an infamous piece of juggling. The whole thing is an abomination. Just to think that, in this century; there are men who preach salvation by sacraments, and salvation by themselves – indeed! Why, it is surely too late in the day to come to us with this drivel! Let us hope that these practices are anachronistic and out-of-date.


Now, a true soul-winner often has to come into close quarters with the devil within men. He has to struggle with their prejudices, their love of sin, their unbelief, their pride, and then, all of a sudden, grapple with their despair. At one moment he strives with their self-righteousness, at the next moment with their unbelief in God. Ten thousand arts are used to prevent the soul-winner from being conqueror in the encounter. But if God has sent him, he will never renounce his hold on the soul he seeks until he has given a throw to the power of sin and won another soul for Christ.

Further, let me commend you, dear friends, the art of buttonholing acquaintances and relatives. If you cannot preach to a hundred, preach to one. Get with the person alone and, in love, quietly and prayerfully talk to him. “One!” you exclaim. Well, is one not enough? I know your ambition, young man. You want to preach to thousands. Be content, and begin with one. Your Master was not ashamed to sit at the well and preach to one. When He had finished His message, He had really done good work to the whole city of Sychar, for that one woman became a missionary to her friends.


Jesus Christ did not come into the world for any of these things. He came “to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10). He has sent His church on the same errand. She is a traitor to the Master who sent her if she is so beguiled by the beauties of taste and art as to forget that to “preach Christ, and Him crucified” (see 1 Corinthians 1:23, 2:2) is the only object for which she exists among the sons of men. The business of the church is the salvation of souls.