Thursday, August 17, 2006

Spurgeon Sermon Quotes

"This is the age of book-making and book-writing. Now-a-days, what with periodical literature and the books upon our shelves, our Bibles do not get much read. I will tell you a truthful story as it was told to me yesterday. There was a young man, who is now a student for the ministry, so extraordinarily ignorant was he of his own Bible, that upon hearing a young minister mention the story of Nebuchadnezzar's being driven out from men, until his nails did grow like birds' claws, and his hair like eagles' feathers, he said to the minister at the close of the sermon, "Well, that was a queer story you told the people, certainly: where did you fish that up?" "Why," said the minister, "have you never read your Bible? Can you not find it in the Book of Daniel?" The young man had read a great many other things, but never read his Bible through, and yet was going to be a teacher of it! Now, I fear that the same ignorance is very current in many persons. They do not know what is in the Bible: they could tell you what is in the Churchman's Penny, or the Christian's Penny, or the Churchman's Magazine, or the Wesleyan Magazine, or the Baptist Magazine, or the Evangelical Magazine, and all that; but there is one old magazine, a magazine of arms, a magazine of wealth, that they forget to read—that old-fashioned book called the Bible..."


"Let us remember, as ministers of the Gospel, what M'Cheyne beautifully said; "Depend upon it," said he, "it is God's Word, not man's comment upon God's Word, that saves souls;" and I have marked, that if ever we have a conversion at any time, in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, the conversion is rather traceable to the text, or to some Scripture quoted in the sermon, than to any trite or original by the preacher. It is God's Word that breaks the fetters and sets the prisoner free; it is God's Word instrumentally that saves souls; and therefore let us bring everything to the touchstone. "To the law and to the testimony; if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."

Spurgeon Sermon: Search the Scriptures

WHEN men will not learn of God, how huge their folly grows! If they despise the wisdom that is from above, how grievously does God allow them to prove their own ignorance! When a man will not bow down before God the Most High, immediately he buildeth for himself an idol; he maketh an image of wood or stone, and he degradeth himself by bowing before the work of his own hands. When men will not receive the Scripture testimony concerning God's creation, straightway they begin to form theories that are a thousand times more ridiculous than...

Hypocrisy with the problem of pain

In addressing the British Humanist Association (The Voltaire Lectures), Richard Dawkins maintains that there is no such thing as evil. We are just “dancing to our DNA” he says. Evil simply does not exist. On the other hand another antagonist of religious faith, clearly acknowledges the existence of evil by asking: “Where is God?” (who isn’t supposed to exist by the way) in light of human pain and suffering.

Truth be told, we do not judge pain and suffering on unprejudiced moral assessments, but on what is painful to us. We do not ask “Where is God?” when our behaviour is questionable. The reason is simple. We do not want God sniffing around in the darker recesses of our own lives. Gregory Koukl of Stand to Reason sums it up nicely: “We don’t really want God to stop us from hurting others; we only cry foul when He doesn’t stop others from hurting us.”

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Does Iran have something in store for August 22?

During the Cold War, both sides possessed weapons of mass destruction, but neither side used them, deterred by what was known as MAD, mutual assured destruction. Similar constraints have no doubt prevented their use in the confrontation between India and Pakistan. In our own day a new such confrontation seems to be looming between a nuclear-armed Iran and its favorite enemies, named by the late Ayatollah Khomeini as the Great Satan and the Little Satan, i.e., the United States and Israel. Against the U.S. the bombs might be delivered by terrorists, a method having the advantage of bearing no return address. Against Israel, the target is small enough to attempt obliteration by direct bombardment.

It seems increasingly likely that the Iranians either have or very soon will have nuclear weapons at their disposal, thanks to their own researches (which began some 15 years ago), to some of their obliging neighbors, and to the ever-helpful rulers of North Korea. The language used by Iranian President Ahmadinejad would seem to indicate the reality and indeed the imminence of this threat. Read full article here...

Iran's president launches weblog

"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has joined a burgeoning international community - by starting his own weblog." Read the full story @ the BBC here...

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

Donate to the Global Fund

100% of your donation will go to the Global Fund and to life saving programs around the world fighting AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria - with no portion being diverted for administrative costs by the United Nations Foundation. To make a secure donation by Credit Card, click here...

bethinking.org

bethinking.org is a website that aims to put the best Christian thinking and communicating resources right into your hands. Whether you are a student, at home or at work we want to help you to talk about the Christian gospel in a way that is relevant, true, culturally aware and attractive. There are hundreds of interesting articles and audio talks on bethinking.org for you to use and think through.


The Zacharias Trust...

...exists to reach those who have objections and questions about the Christian faith, as well as to equip Christians to share their faith with confidence.

We seek to challenge those who shape the ideas of our culture with the credibility of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We do this through...

Pictures that lie

"This photo isn't exactly what it appears to be--nor are the other images that follow in this photo gallery. All were manipulated beyond straightforward cropping of edges or lightening shaded areas. Often they have a key element inserted or deleted." Read full story @ CNET...

Monday, August 14, 2006

Introducing Windows Live Writer

Windows Live Writer is a desktop application that makes it easier to compose compelling blog posts using Windows Live Spaces or your current blog service.

Of course this post was made using the Live Writer application. It looks promising so far and can only get better.

Friday, August 11, 2006

Abortion harmful to women

A recent editorial in the North American press argued that abortion is “just another operation.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Consider the following ways abortion can harm a woman’s mental and physical health:

  • In her testimony before a Senate subcommittee in 2004, Dr. Elizabeth Shadigan testified that, “abortion increases rates of breast cancer, placenta previa, pre-term births and maternal suicide…Statistically, all types of deaths are higher with women who have had induced abortions.”

  • After extensive research, Dr. Joel Brind, Professor of Endocrinology at City University of New York, concludes, “the single most avoidable risk factor for breast cancer is abortion.” Women who have abortions increase their risk of breast cancer by a minimum of 50 percent and as much as 300 percent.

  • Post-abortion specialist David Reardon writes, “In a study of post-abortion patients only 8 weeks after their abortion, researchers found that 44% complained of nervous disorders, 36% had experienced sleep disorders, 31% had regrets, and 11% had been prescribed psychotropic medicine by their family doctor.” This study is significant since some women show no apparent effects from their abortions until years later.

Mother Teresa saw abortion, not only as harmful to women, but as “the greatest destroyer of love and peace.” This is what she had to say, “Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love but to use any violence to get what they want. If we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell people not to kill one another?” You tell me.

Mother Teresa on abortion

"But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself.

And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even His life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion should be helped to love, that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free-time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts.

By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems. And, by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world. The father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So abortion just leads to more abortion.

Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. This is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion."

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Art, Music & Apologetics: An e4 Course (DVD)

This is a full-length, graduate-level course that includes over 23 video hours of lecture and interaction, offered here in the e4 learning software.

Session Listing:
1. Lecture 01: Christian Apologetics
2. Lecture 02: Foundations
3. Lecture 03: History
4. Lecture 04: Art & Cultural Analysis
5. Interaction: Apologetics & Art
6. Lecture 05: Christian Worldview
7. Interaction: Culture
8. Lecture 06: Faith & Reason
9. Lecture 07: Post(modernity)
10. Interaction: History
11. Interaction: Theology
12. Lecture 08: Unbelief
13. Lecture 09: Homecoming
14. Interaction: Apologetics
15. Lecture 10: The Problem of Evil
16. Lecture 11: Reflecting on Evil
17. Lecture 12: Worldwide Apologetics
18. Interaction: Pain & Evil
19. Lecture 13: Jazz and Spirituality (Concert)
20. Lecture 14: Pluralism and Truth
21. Lecture 15: Worship
22. Interaction: Redemption
23. Lecture 16: Reflections

Terror plot in final stages...

Terrorists were in the final stages of planning to blow up planes heading from the United Kingdom to the United States, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said Thursday. Read more here...

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

New MP3 player: Zen Neeon 2

This player is supposed to be a competitor for the iPod nano. It looks like a good option if you're shopping for an MP3 player. Read more here...

Resources from RZIM

I put in another order for some resources from RZIM. My expectations were exceeded with my first order. The new order includes:

Q & A Volume IV

Truth?

What does it mean to be human?

Engaging Culture with Conversations that Count

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Floating bed anyone?

A young Dutch architect has created a floating bed which hovers above the ground through magnetic force and comes with a price tag of 1.2 million euros ($1.54 million). Read more here...

A good study Bible

I would highly recommend the Life in the Spirit Study Bible (NIV). It is the successor to the Full Life Study Bible (which I used previously. My copy of it is in shambles now) from Zondervan Publishing. Good notes, articles, introduction/survey and background information on each book. It's a good investment for anyone serious about reading and studying the word of God.

August mentoring letter from STR

"Got a captive audience? 8 tactics to help you get the message across, without your style getting in the way." Read more...

Help for a simple-minded letter

I had asked for some suggestions on how (if?) I should go about resonding to this simple-minded tirade which appeared recently in the press. Here are two excerpts from some responses I got via e-mail:

"It is a very simplistic critique of religion. I pray that God will give you wisdom in knowing which of his many accusations to respond to. "


"I'd keep focused on one point. This guy is all over the place and will not be taken seriously by serious readers. Carefully and graciously distinguish between two different kinds of prophecy - the kind that is evidential (certain Old Testament prophecies, like those in Daniel and those that foretell of the coming Messiah for example, are highly evidential) and the kind that is more like superstition. If you make a simple, careful distinction, his letter will be seen for what it is: a simple-minded rant."

Friday, August 04, 2006

Chesterton on "The Sceptic"

"Latter-day scepticism is fond of calling itself progressive; but scepticism is really reactionary. Scepticism goes back; it attempts to unsettle what has already been settled. Instead of trying to break up new fields with its plough, it simply tries to break up the plough."

"The average businessman began to be agnostic, not so much because he did not know where he was, as because he wanted to forget. Many of the rich took to scepticism exactly as the poor took to drink; because it was a way out."

"Pride consists in a man making his personality the only test, instead of making truth the test. The sceptic feels himself too large to measure life by the largest things; and ends by measuring it by the smallest thing of all."

Chesterton on atheism

"Atheism is indeed the most daring of all dogmas . . . for it is the assertion of a universal negative."

"I do not feel any contempt for an atheist, who is often a man limited and constrained by his own logic to a very sad simplification."

"If there were no God, there would be no atheists."

On "bloodshed in the name of religion"

One of the most frequent, and simplistic, arguments against religion is how much bloodshed is done in her name. People who use this argument ignore (or conveniently forget) that the 20th century has been the bloodiest century in world history. In the 20th century alone, more than 130 million people have died in the name of secular ideologies. Ideologies that have nothing to do with religion have been the cause of the most bloodshed. That is a fact.

The accusation that bloodshed was done “all in the name of Jesus” can only be a valid statement against our Lord, if He had in fact commanded His disciples to do such things. So all that is left, is for the “accuser of the brethren” to point out exactly where in the New Testament Jesus commanded His disciples to do such things. Although a more profitable exercise would be to actually read the New Testament properly.

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Comic book philosophy?

"God" as postulated by religion is an intellectual creation of man, and a purely contrived idea. And "theology" nothing more than comic-book philosophy.
That is the view of a recent letter-writer to the Daily Nation. But what could be more "comic-book philosophy" than rambling on and on about a "God" who is a purely contrived idea? Of course just saying "God as postulated by religion is an intellectual creation of man, and a purely contrived idea" (over and over again in letters over the years) automatically makes it true. Alrighty then...ROTFL

WordPress Web Hosting

I'm thinking (yet again) about getting my own domain name and transferring my blog to a hosting company. I'm looking at the various options recommended over at the WordPress Web Hosting section...

Francis Bacon on atheism

"Atheism is rather in the lip than in the heart of man."

"A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion."

Logos Bible Software 3 released!

"The chart below lets you compare at a glance the titles in each of the Logos Bible Software 3 collections. All books, addins and parallel passages listed in a column are included and unlocked with purchase of that product." Read all about it here...

Beneath the surface

Every once in a while someone will express their disdain for anything religion in the press. They don’t usually have any rational arguments to backup their emotional tirades, but such is life. More often than not, these folks don’t really have a problem with God Himself, but rather, with unresolved issues in their own relationships with the father-figure in their own life. If we were to examine a list of the “who’s who” of atheists/agnostics: Nietzsche, Hume, Russell, Voltaire, Freud, H.G. Wells – we will quickly discover that many (if not all) of them had extremely strained relationships with their fathers. This is no coincidence. Some people reject the concept of a loving, caring and compassionate heavenly Father because they have never experienced much love, care or compassion from their earthly fathers.

Beneath the surface, most embittered unbelievers just need, love – the most powerful apologetic. And love is no better personified as in the person Jesus Christ, of whom Paul writes: “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God's wrath through him! For if, when we were God's enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life! Not only is this so, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation” (Romans 5:8-11). There is eternal life and love in the Cross of Jesus Christ. The invitation of the psalmist is open, especially to embittered unbelievers: “Taste and see that the LORD is good...” (Psalm 34:8). And that’s taste; not think.

Mourinho wary of United

Jose Mourinho sees United and Arsenal as the main threats to Chelsea's Premiership title hopes this season. Both sides have made just one new signing each since last term - Michael Carrick and Tomas Rosicky - but Mourinho feels this fine-tuning will enhance both sides dramatically...

Letter to the Editor: August 02, 2006

Below is the full text of the latest offering from one of Barbados' most vocal unbelievers:


"ALL I CAN DO is howl and roll on the ground, holding my belly in fits of laughter when I hear all the rubbish about "prophesy" and "God told me this" and "God told me that" talk. There is not one single bit of evidence to support all this God talk that goes around and which mystifies and entrances the Barbadian (and other) publics. In the name of God, in this day, we have Western nations railing against countries in the Middle East and Asia. In the name of the same God we have the same Middle East nations railing against the West. One is "righteous" the other 'terrorist'. Which is which? From the first crusade launched by Pope Urban II at the Council of Clermont in 1095 to the last in 1270, we had "Christians" exhorted to march to the Middle East to kill evil Muslims and Jews. The slaughter of Jews and Muslims was horrifying. Cities were devastated, women were raped, and both adults and children were killed without mercy. All in the name of Jesus. "God" as postulated by religion is an intellectual creation of man, and a purely contrived idea. And "theology" nothing more than comic-book philosophy. Does man have free will or not? If we do have free will, then such a thing as "prophesy" is impossible. For prophesy indicates something coming from which we are unable to flee, whereas if we do have free will, we can escape. Of course you and I can make prophesies. I can prophesy that shortly after 6 p.m this evening it will get dark and night will come. I can prophesy that "coming soon there will be a terrific storm with much thunder and lightning". But are these prophesies?

What makes me laugh the hardest is when churches and mosques and pilgrims and innocent people get blasted to smithereens. Apparently God does not protect His own. When you ask a cleric why this happens you are told: "God does not interfere in the free will of men." That's cool. But then we have the epitome of anomaly . . . a little later the same day you are called to prayer, to pray (example) for little Mary who is ill. We are told: "Come and join us in prayer for little Mary. Let us pray to our merciful Father in heaven that He will protect her during her operation and bring her safely through to good and enduring health." And Barbadians (and others) go right along with it. Lambs led to the slaughter. "

The letter, like so many of the writer's offerings on religion/philosophy, is full of fallicies but it does touch on some important points - free will, problem of evil, prayer and so on - and therfore warrants some kind of response. Hell hath no fury like this man rambling about religion. Funny thing is, for someone who doesn't believe in God, he sure spends a lot of time thinking and writing about him.

1 Timothy 6:6-10 (NIV)

"But godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out of it. But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with that. People who want to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs."

Godlessness in the Last Days

"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God — having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with them" (2 Tim. 3:1-5).

Doing what is good

"Remind the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready to do whatever is good, to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and to show true humility toward all men. At one time we too were foolish, disobedient, deceived and enslaved by all kinds of passions and pleasures. We lived in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another. But when the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that, having been justified by his grace, we might become heirs having the hope of eternal life. This is a trustworthy saying. And I want you to stress these things, so that those who have trusted in God may be careful to devote themselves to doing what is good. These things are excellent and profitable for everyone" (Titus 3:1-8, NIV).

Titus 2:11-15 (NIV)

"For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men. It teaches us to say "No" to ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright and godly lives in this present age, while we wait for the blessed hope — the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do what is good. These, then, are the things you should teach. Encourage and rebuke with all authority. Do not let anyone despise you."

Monday, July 31, 2006

How to read the Bible

I'm currently reading, "How to read the Bible for all it's worth", and I'm enjoying it thoroughly. I think all Christians who are serious about their Bible study, should get a copy.

The Supremacy of the Son of God

"The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross" (Colossians 1: 15-20, TNIV).

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Playstation 3 Resource Centre

Came across another great PS3 site. Lots of information, pics, videos and so forth. Check it out...

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Microsoft Office System 2007

I've been using Office 2007 (Beta 2) for a while now and I love it. The new user interface (UI) is new much more intuitive. I spend most of my time in Word and you can get a lot more done, more quickly because of the new UI. I can't wait until the final build is available.

Microsoft confirms 'Zune'

Whilst I don't think there is such a thing as an 'iPod killer', there are certainly some good alternatives to Apple's player out there. Microsoft has officially confirmed their alternative: Zune. Check out the teaser website and the Zune Insider Blog.

Monday, July 24, 2006

A brief reflection on music

It was Boethius who said: “Music is a part of us, and either ennobles or degrades our behaviour”. Next time you listen to a song, think about how that quote applies to what you are listening to.

Stem cell alternatives being ignored

The Weekly Standard has an excellent editorial, based on this moral principle: "There are some things we should never do, even in the name of progress. The moral history of mankind, as Paul Ramsey once said, is more important than its medical history." It is with this in mind that I wonder why more press attention is being given to President Bush’s plan to veto the bill funding embryonic stem cell research as opposed to the other (neglected) bills in the US Senate that would fund stem cell research that doesn't destroy embryos. Why are the majority of politicians in the US House and Senate, and their counter-parts in Europe (albeit to a lesser extent), so bent on destroying human embryos when alternatives are available?

Primer on Hezbollah

Hezbollah, the group at the heart of the Lebanese conflict, is the spearhead of Iran’s ambitions to be a superpower, says Iranian commentator Amir Taheri. Read full article here...

7 blunders

Mohandas Gandhi compiled a list he called “The Seven Blunders of the World”. Now granted, the seventh item on the list is pretty universal; but I think we are heading down the wrong road because too many of the other items on this list are also true of our country today:

1. Wealth without work.

2. Pleasure with conscience.

3. Knowledge without character.

4. Commerce without morality.

5. Science without humanity.

6. Worship without sacrifice.

7. Politics without principle.

Friday, July 21, 2006

Playstation 3 blurb

The Playstation 3 will "change the nature of gaming and entertainment forever". It will also drain your pockets. With a price tag of USD$499 (20GB model) or USD$599 (60GB model); and games for around USD$60 a pop. But it's not just a console anymore, it's actually a computer. With specs like these, this machine is not a toy.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

My current favourite song...

"Stained Glass Masquerade"

Is there anyone that fails
Is there anyone that falls
Am I the only one in church today feelin' so small

Cause when I take a look around
Everybody seems so strong
I know they'll soon discover
That I don't belong

So I tuck it all away, like everything's okay
If I make them all believe it, maybe I'll believe it too
So with a painted grin, I play the part again
So everyone will see me the way that I see them

Are we happy plastic people
Under shiny plastic steeples
With walls around our weakness
And smiles to hide our pain
But if the invitation's open
To every heart that has been broken
Maybe then we close the curtain
On our stained glass masquerade

Is there anyone who's been there
Are there any hands to raise
Am I the only one who's traded
In the altar for a stage

The performance is convincing
And we know every line by heart
Only when no one is watching
Can we really fall apart

But would it set me free
If I dared to let you see
The truth behind the person
That you imagine me to be
Would your arms be open
Or would you walk away
Would the love of Jesus
Be enough to make you stay

Liberal Christianity is paying for its sins (article link)

You want to have gay sex? Be a female bishop? Change God's name to Sophia? Go ahead. The just-elected Episcopal presiding bishop, Katharine Jefferts Schori, is a one-woman combination of all these things, having voted for Robinson, blessed same-sex couples in her Nevada diocese, prayed to a female Jesus at the Columbus convention and invited former Newark, N.J., bishop John Shelby Spong, famous for denying Christ's divinity, to address her priests. Read full article here...

God's perfect timing - Romans 5:6-11

"You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. Very rarely will anyone die for a righteous man, though for a good man someone might possibly dare to die. But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God's wrath through him! For if, when we were God's enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life! Not only is this so, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation."

Monday, July 17, 2006

The absolute moral law

English essayist and critic, Samuel Butler once commented that, ‘the only absolute morality is absolute stagnation.’ This is often the cry of the secular humanist who thinks that if we would only abandon the old Victorian ideas in light of science, technology and all that goes with it, then all will be well in the garden. What these people cannot stand is the truth that there is an eternal, changeless moral law which is binding on all of mankind, regardless of location, time, colour, class or creed.

C. S. Lewis in his essay, “The Poison of Subjectivism”, had this to say: “To infer that whatever stands too long must be unwholesome is to be a victim of metaphor. Space does not sink because it has preserved its three dimensions from the beginning. Love is not dishonoured by constancy. Does a permanent unchanging moral code preclude progress? On the contrary, except on the presupposition of a changeless standard, progress is impossible. If absolute good is a fixed point, it is at least possible that we should get nearer and nearer to it, but if the terminal is as mobile as the train, how can the train progress towards it? Our ideas of ‘the good’ may change, but they cannot change either for the better or for the worse if there is no absolute and immutable good to which they can approximate or from which they can recede. We can go on getting a sum more and more nearly right only If one perfectly right answer is ‘stagnant’.”

Monday, July 10, 2006

Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's Purse is a nondenominational evangelical Christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. Since 1970, Samaritan's Purse has helped meet needs of people who are victims of war, poverty, natural disasters, disease, and famine with the purpose of sharing God's love through His Son, Jesus Christ. The organization serves the Church worldwide to promote the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Friday, July 07, 2006

Click and donate...

...to any of the following worthwhile charaties/organizations:

Remenber that...

“The Dead Sea is the dead sea because it continually receives and never gives.” — Anonymous

Read more giving quotations here...

Thursday, July 06, 2006

"The Trouble with 'X'"... by C.S. Lewis

I SUPPOSE I may assume that seven out of ten of those who read these lines are in some kind of difficulty about some other human being. Either at work or at home, either the people who employ you or those whom you employ, either those who share your house or those whose house you share, either your in-laws or parents or children, your wife or husband, are making life harder for you that it need be even in these days. It is to be hoped that we do not often mention these difficulties (especially the domestic ones) to outsiders. But sometimes we do. An outside friend asks us why we are looking so glum, and the truth comes out.

On such occasions the outside friends usually says, ‘But why don’t you tell them? Why don’t you go to your wife (or husband, or father, or daughter, or boss or land-lady, or lodger) and have it all out? People are usually reasonable. All you’ve got to do is to make them see things in the right light. Explain it to them in a reasonable, quiet, friendly way.’ And we, whatever we say outwardly, think sadly to ourselves, ‘He doesn’t know “X”.’ We do. We know how utterly hopeless it is to make ‘X’ see reason. Either we’ve never tried it over and over again – tried it until we are sick of trying it – or else we’ve never tried because we saw from the beginning how useless it would be. We know that if we attempt to ‘have it all out with “X”’ there will either be a ‘scene’ or else ‘X’ will stare at us in blank amazement and say ‘I don’t know what on earth you’re talking about’; or else (which is perhaps worse of all) ‘X’ will quite agree with us and promise to turn over a new leaf and put everything on new footing – and then, twenty-four hours later, will be exactly the same as ‘X’ has always been.

You know, in fact, that any attempt to talk things over with ‘X’ will shipwreck on the old, fatal flaw in ‘X’s’ character. And you see, looking back, how all the plans you have ever made always have shipwrecked on that fatal flaw – on ‘X’s’ incurable jealously, laziness, or touchiness, or muddle headedness, or bossiness, or ill temper, or changeableness. Up to a certain age you have perhaps had the illusion that some external stroke of good fortune – an improvement in health, a raise of salary, the end of the way – would solve your difficulty. But you know better now. The war is over, and you realize that even if you became a millionaire, your husband would still be a bully, or your wife would still nag or your son would still drink, or you’d still have your mother-in-law to live with you.

It is a great step forward to realize that this is so; to face the fact that even if all external things went right, real happiness would still depend on the character of the people you have to live with – and that you can’t alter their characters. And now comes the point. When you have seen this you have, for the first time, had a glimpse of what it must be like for God. For, of course, this is (in one way) just what God Himself is up against. He has provided a rich, beautiful world for people to live in. He has given them intelligence to show them how it can be used, and conscience to show them how it ought to be used. He has contrived that the things they need for their biological life (food, drink, rest, sleep, exercise) should be positively delightful to them. And, having done all this, He then sees all His plans spoiled – just as our little plans are spoiled – by the crookedness of the people themselves. All the things He has given them to be happy they turn into occasions for quarrelling and jealousy, and excess and hoarding, and tomfoolery.

You may say that it is very different for God because He could, if He pleased, alter people’s characters, and we can’t. But this difference doesn’t go quite as deep as we may at first think. God has made it a rule for Himself that He won’t alter people’s character by force. He can and will alter them – but only if the people will let Him. In that way He has really and truly limited His power. Sometimes we wonder why He has done so, or even wish that He hadn’t. But apparently He thinks it worth doing. He would rather have a world of free beings, with all its risks, than a world of people who did right like machines because they couldn’t do anything else. The more we succeed in imagining what a world of perfect automatic beings would be like, the more, I think, we shall see His wisdom.

I said that when we see how all our plans shipwreck on the characters of the people we have to deal with, we are ‘in one way’ seeing what it must be like for God. But only one way. There are two respects in which God’s view must be very different from ours. In the first place, He sees (like you) how all the people in your home or your job are in various degrees awkward of difficult; but when He looks into that home or factory or office He sees one more person of the same kind – the one you never see. I mean, of course, yourself. That is the next great step in wisdom – to realize that you are also just that sort of person. You also have a fatal flaw in your character. All the hopes and plans of others have again and again shipwrecked on your character just as your hopes and plans have shipwrecked on theirs.

It is no good passing this over with some vague, general admission such as ‘Of course, I know I have my faults.’ It is important to realize that there is some really fatal flaw in you: something which gives the others just that same feeling of despair which their flaws give you. And it is almost certainly something you don’t know about – like what the advertisements call ‘halitosis’, which everyone notices except the person who has it. But why, you ask, don’t the others tell me? Believe me, they have tried to tell you over and over again, and you just couldn’t ‘take it’. Perhaps a good deal of what you call their ‘nagging’ or ‘bad temper’ or ‘queerness’ are just their attempts to make you see the truth. And even the faults you do know you don’t know fully. You say, ‘I admit I lost my tempter last night’; but the others know you’re always doing it, that you are a bad-tempered person. You say, ‘I admit I drank too much last Saturday’; but every one else knows that you are an habitual drunkard.

That is one way in which God’s view must differ from mine. He sees all the characters: I see all except my own. But the second difference is this. He loves the people in spite of their faults. He goes on loving, He does not let go. Don’t say, ‘It’s all very well for Him; He hasn’t got to live with them.’ He has. He is inside them as well as outside them. He is with them far more intimately and closely and incessantly that we can ever be. Every vile thought within their minds (and ours), every moment of spite, envy, arrogance, greed and self-conceit comes right up against His patient and longing love, and grieves His spirit more than it grieves ours.

The moment we can imitate God in both these respects, the more progress we shall make. We must love ‘X’ more; and we must learn to see ourselves as a person of exactly the same kind. Some people say it is morbid to be always thinking of one’s own faults. That would be all very well if most of us could stop thinking of our own without soon beginning to think about those of other people. For unfortunately we enjoy thinking about other people’s faults: and in the proper sense of the word ‘morbid’, that is the most morbid pleasure in the world.

We don’t like rationing which is imposed on us, but I suggest one form of rationing which we ought to impose on ourselves. Abstain from all thinking about other people’s faults, unless your duties as a teacher or parent make it necessary to think about them. Whenever the thoughts come unnecessarily into one’s mind, why not simply shove them away? And think of one’s own faults instead? For there with God’s help, one can do something. Of all the awkward people in your house or job there is only one whom you can improve very much. That is the practical end at which to begin. And really, we’d better. The job has to be tackled some day and every day we put it off will make it harder to begin.

What, after all, is the alternative? You see clearly enough that nothing, not even God with all His power, can make ‘X’ really happy as long as ‘X’ remains envious, self-centered, and spiteful. Be sure that there is something inside you which, unless it is altered, will put it out of God’s power to prevent your bring eternally miserable. While that something remains there can be no Heaven for you, just as there can be no sweet smells for a man with a cold in the nose, and no music for a man who is deaf. It’s not a question of God ‘sending’ us to Hell. In each of us there is something growing up which will of itself be Hell unless it is nipped in the bud. The matter is serious: let us put ourselves in His hands at once – this very day, this hour.

Monday, July 03, 2006

Highly recommended

I recently received (and listened to) the following resources from RZIM: CD403 - Finding Water in the Desert, CD214 - The Lord Is My Light and CD168 - The Revelation of God Through Us: Apologetics with a Touch. I would highly recommend all of them. The highlight for me was the message Amazing Grace and the Gospel of Reconciliation by Stuart McAllister from Finding Water in the Desert. Do yourself a favour and get these resources...

The greatest conversation ever

Now there was a man of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a member of the Jewish ruling council. He came to Jesus at night and said, "Rabbi, we know you are a teacher who has come from God. For no one could perform the miraculous signs you are doing if God were not with him." In reply Jesus declared, "I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again."

"How can a man be born when he is old?" Nicodemus asked. "Surely he cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb to be born!"

Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.' The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit."

"How can this be?" Nicodemus asked.

"You are Israel's teacher," said Jesus, "and do you not understand these things? I tell you the truth, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.

This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."

Friday, June 23, 2006

Salvomag.com...

...is the home of a new magazine. Their mission is stated below:

Blasting holes in scientific naturalism, marveling at the intricate design of the universe, and promoting life in a culture of death.

Critiquing art, music, film, television, and literature, interrupting mass media influence, and questioning the sanity of our consumerist lifestyle.

Countering destructive ideologies, replacing revisionist fictions with undeniable facts, nd paring away political correctness.

Debunking the cultural myths that have undercut human dignity, all but destroyed the notions of virtue and morality, and slowly eroded our appetite for transcendence.

Recovering the one worldview that actually works.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

New products @ RZIM

RZIM has some new products on their store front for Summer 2006. They include:

They look pretty interesting and will probably be added to my wish list. I have the following items on order from them:

Heat get their first title...

...after "back-sweeping" the Dallas Mavericks. I didn't really follow The Finals but Mavs fans seem to think they were hard done by the officiating. But for now, the Heat celebrate their first NBA title.

Monday, June 19, 2006

Free seminary courses online

The courseware posted on this site comprises an assortment of classes from Covenant Seminary's master's degree programs. Their selection is designed to provide a broad, foundational knowledge of the Scriptures as well as guidance for engaging a variety of ministry contexts through the study of church history, doctrine and practice.

Been a long time...

since I last posted. Was extremely busy with moving house (and all that goes with that) and Bible shool (assignments plus exams coming up). The move was a huge step and drained us physically and emotionally. But we have settled nicely and are very thankful to have our own home ... ;)

Currently reading...

The Collected Works of C.S. Lewis, which is quite enjoyable. The volume contains three seperate novels and I'm currently to God in the Dock. I would definitely recommend it to anyone, especially C.S. Lewis fans ;)

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Exciting time for sports fans...

That's what yesterday (May 17th) proved to be. First off, Barcelona came from one goal down to beat a 10-man Arsenal 2-1 in the UEFA Champions League Final. As a Manchester United fan, that was very good news (and I say that unashamedly).

The Cleveland Cavilers have shut-up Rasheed Wallace and the Pistions (at least for now) by shocking them on their home floor to take a 3-2 series lead back to Cleveland. If the Cavs pull off this upset it will be one of the biggest playoff upsets in history - Guaran-sheed!

And last but not least, my Spurs have lived to play at least one more game in Dallas after winning by one-point at home. Duncan hit is first 12 shots on his way to a 36 point, 12 rebound game.

Giving

Accoring to Wikipedia, Philanthropy is the voluntary act of donating money or goods or providing some other support to a charitable cause, usually over an extended period of time. In a more fundamental sense, philanthropy may encompass any activity which is intended to enhance the common good or improve human well being. Someone who is well known for practicing philanthropy may sometimes be called a philanthropist. Although such individuals are often very wealthy, people may nevertheless perform philanthropic acts without possessing great wealth.

I've been on this earth less than 30 years, and if there is one thing that is true, it is Acts 20:35: "It is more blessed to give than to receive." Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to let other people get the blessing.

Gospel for Asia and The Global Fund seem to be very worthwhile causes. I have to do a bit more research on The Global Fund, but it's probably only a matter of time before I start to chip in there as well. Remember, people may nevertheless perform philanthropic acts without possessing great wealth.

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

PS3: Inside and Out

GameSpot is now featuring a detailed look at Sony's highly anticipated PS3. Read full story here...

The Global Fund

The Global Fund represents a first-time opportunity to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria on an unprecedented scale. It is an enormous undertaking, but our goals are within reach. If you would like to assist our efforts to combat these life-threatening diseases, you may make a donation of any amount to the Global Fund. Through our grant agreement system which relies on in-country partnership and leadership, you can be assured that your contribution will go directly to people in regions that are most affected by these diseases. Find out more here...

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Champs on the ropes

My beloved Spurs are one game away from elimination in the 2006 NBA Playoffs. Last night's over-time loss to the Mavericks was heart-breaking...

Friday, May 12, 2006

Top 20 Products @ RZIM

Check out the top 20 products people are ordering over at RZIM...

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

Article link: Going long for Jesus

It's no accident that pro sports often resemble holy revival meetings. Devout athletes who praise God are coached by evangelical ministries with ties to the Christian right. But many players and fans feel left out of the huddle. Read full article here...

Monday, May 08, 2006

Book wish: Exploring Reality

Added yet another title to the list of books I plan on reading (eventually). This one is called Exploring Reality : The Intertwining of Science and Religion. So much books and so little time. I will probably get Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview and Unspeakable : Facing Up to Evil in an Age of Genocide and Terror next. They both look like good reads.

Blog makeover

I'm mulling over a makeover for Light the Lamp. I'm thinking about getting a Wordpress theme from Template Monster and a hosting plan from LivingDot. Of course this would be in the very distant future...

7 more wins...

and the San Antonio Spurs would be back in the NBA Finals. Yesterday they won (not very convincingly) against the Dallas Mavericks.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

The Da Vinci Code Cracks

The latest issue of Solid Ground from Stand to Reason contains some good material on "cracking" Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code. You will need Adobe Acrobat reader to view the document.

Friday, April 21, 2006

Blog link: Between two worlds

I came across and interesting link whilst over at the Stand to Reason blog. It's called Between two worlds: A Mix of Theology, Philosophy, Politics, and Culture. Make sure to check it out.

Evolution and morality

Evolutionists would have us believe that man (including morality) evolved. But this is a bit odd isn’t it? Morals seem to be dissolving rather than evolving. Scientists have observed monkeys practicing basic “moral” behaviour and conclude that it is the result of natural selection. But motive and intent are crucial parts of moral conduct so it is quite silly to think that morality can be reduced to observable behaviour.

If evolution were true, virtues like mercy and love would not be acts of “virtue” that were freely chosen. They would be instinctive behaviours that were hard-wired for personal survival (a fact evolutionists readily admit). However, moral values involve chosen traits, not instinctual ones. This is most evident in the fact that we hold people morally responsible for free choices, not innate reactions. No one goes before the law court and argues, “Evolution, genetics and natural selection made me do it. Survival of the fittest and all that good stuff your honour.” If morality could be reduced to a naturalistic mechanism, it wouldn’t be morality anymore.

Darwin’s disciples fail to realize (or admit) that morality is not simply an account of what we do (descriptive), but a system explaining what we ought to do (prescriptive), and therefore evolution can’t explain it. If you are confused about origins, be sure to include Answers in Genesis and True Origin Archive in your research.

Atheism's bloody past

It was Laurence Sterne who said, “Whenever a man talks loudly against religion, always suspect that it is not his reason, but his passions which have got the better of his creed.” Atheism is completely illogical and anyone with a basic introduction to philosophy should pick this up. Atheism affirms a negative in the absolute (there is no God), which is an obvious logical contradiction. Bertrand Russell realized (and admitted) this in his later essays and it is the primary reason he switched to agnosticism.

On the opinion that innocent blood has been shed in the name of religion, we should be honest enough to admit that atheism has an equally, if not, bloodier history. Stalin was an avowed atheist. In fact, Lenin (who read Friedrich Nietzsche) specifically selected Stalin because of his hatred of things religious. Hitler, who personally presented a copy of Friedrich Nietzsche’s writings to Benito Mussolini, gave Nietzsche’s theory of the “Superman”, a military interpretation. The “Superman” was an individual who overcame what Nietzsche termed the “slave morality” of traditional values, and lived according to his own morality. The rest as they say, is history. Nietzsche advanced the idea that “God is dead,” or, “traditional morality was no longer relevant in people’s lives”. Nietzsche and countless other ungodly philosophers have heavily impacted the Western mindset, so it is little wonder that we are in this moral quagmire.

If atheism is true then no moral law exists. If morality is espoused, it is merely utilitarian, pragmatic, subjective or emotive. The West is being rocked at her knees because we have lost the point of reference for the values which we are desperately trying to hold onto. We think we can survive without adhering to a transcendent moral law. Atheism’s bloody past cries out against the experiment.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

The abolition of sin

Modern society is desperately trying to abolish the concept of sin. With political correctness now on steroids, we dress up sin with high-sounding words. Vices have become virtues and vice versa. Take the Good as New “translation” of the sacred Christian Scriptures. This translation describes itself as women, gay and sinner friendly. The Scripture says, “for it is better to marry than to burn with passion” (1 Corinthians 7:9). They have changed it to “If you know you have strong needs, get yourself a partner. Better than being frustrated.” To avoid offending people in homosexual relationships, references to “husband and wife” are replaced with “partner.”

This “translation” is a bit shocking but not totally surprising. Paul warned young Timothy about this, “For the time will come when people will not put up with healthy doctrine but with itching ears will surround themselves with teachers who cater to their own needs” (2 Timothy 4:3). We can sugar coat sin and psychoanalyze ourselves until the cows come home. But we should also remember the prophet Isaiah’s words: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! (Isaiah 5:20)”

Monday, March 20, 2006

Monday, March 06, 2006

The problem with Christianity

Mohandas Gandhi gave a lucid explanation of Christianity’s problems when he said, “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” This is a common (and legitimate) “beef” many have with the Christian faith. The problem is not Christianity per se, but Christians. When Christians behave badly, we throw serious doubt on the credibility of the gospel and our claims to be “new creatures in Christ Jesus.”

The world is in a sense right to judge Christianity by its fruits. The Lord himself was most severe when he dealt with the religious leaders of his day who should have known better and judgement must begin at the house of God (1 Peter 4:17) if it is to being at all. But the world should be careful in her judging of Christendom. It tends to give unbelievers a false sense of security outside of Christ. One is left to think they can point out a couple of “hypocritical Christians”, make the case that they were “nicer” or “more virtuous” and all will be well. But it won’t be. Ultimately, each of us will be judged individually on our acceptance or rejection of Christ. In the words of Christ, “For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:17-18)”

To be content to live outside of Christ and point to Christians who behave more like the devil himself is to do a great disservice to your soul. In the parable of the weeds and the field, the weeds and the wheat had to grow together lest the servants pulled out some of the wheat with the weeds. So it is in Christendom, the weeds and the wheat must grow together. But at the end of the age, the Lord will “send his angels to gather from his kingdom everything that causes others to sin and those who practice lawlessness and they will throw them into a blazing furnace.” Literally.

The missing link

The evolutionist is still looking for “the missing link”, the evolutionary “ancestor” of both human beings and modern apes. One would think they stand a better chance of finding a one-ended stick. Now granted, the evolutionist is not wrong in the search for “the missing link”, simply misguided. Instead of combing the earth for fossils, they should look to Jesus Christ. He is the missing link, the one through whom God reconciled the world to himself. As the apostle Paul put it, “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ…” (2 Cor. 5:17-18).

Jesus Christ is the “missing link” and once man links us with him, then the “next stage of evolution” can begin. Only then can man begin the long, arduous process of becoming what he was always intended to be – a new creature in Christ Jesus. Who ever said evolution and Christianity were incompatible?

Monday, February 27, 2006

No ordinary man

After Jesus delivered his most quoted sermon (Matthew 5-7), Matthew tells us, “the people were astonished at his doctrine: For he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes” (Matthew 7:28-29). Some say Jesus is just a prophet, a good man, a moral teacher, but not God. Yet, if we pay close attention to his words, it is clear that he is God. The most obvious clue is his claim to forgive sins.

In Mark 2:7, the scribes and the religious teachers asked, “Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?” In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis writes, “Now unless the speaker is God, this is really so preposterous as to be comic. We can all understand how a man forgives offences against himself. You tread on my toes and I forgive you, you steal my money and I forgive you. But what should we make of a man, himself unrobbed and untrodden on, who announced that he forgave you for treading on other men’s toes and stealing other men’s money? Asinine fatuity is the kindest description we should give his conduct. Yet this is what Jesus did.” No ordinary man (in his right mind) can claim to forgive all sins. No ordinary man says, “Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins” (John 8:23-24). No wonder the people asked, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven? (John 6:42)” This is easily answered. Jesus Christ, is no ordinary man.

God is just

You have probably heard it said over and over again that, “God is love.” Whilst this is true, I think we have overemphasized this truth at the expense of another, namely, “God is just.” To quote “God is love” ad nauseam might mislead people into thinking they can transgress God’s law, never repent and everything will be alright in the end because, “God is love.” God is love, but it is equally true that God is just. We should therefore be careful not to mistake God’s love for lack of justice. If we, who are evil, exact justice, then how much more a God who is perfectly holy, good and pure?

The writer of Hebrews offers us a sobering reminder that God’s love and grace is not a license to do as we like. To those who trample God’s Son and insult the Spirit of grace, the dictum is this, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Hebrews 10:31).” Does God love you? Yes. Will He nonchalantly turn a blind eye to the transgression of His law? Absolutely not. Justice will be exacted, not because He is cruel, but because He is love; and perfect love always exacts justice.

Problems with Islam

It does not matter if offense is not meant, some will probably be taken. Therefore let me get straight to the point. There are some problems I have with Islam (not Muslims) which I find very hard, if not impossible, to reconcile.

Their prophet is supposed to be the last and final prophet to the entire world. He performed no miracles because he said there was no need for it. Yet the Qur’an is believed to be a miracle by Muslims, but the Qur’an is in Arabic. So unless one knows Arabic, one cannot perceive the miracle. What is even more troubling is the fact that a large number of Muslims in the world do not even speak (or understand) Arabic, so the Qur’an in its original language is not accessible to them. Nevertheless, Muslims have traditionally objected to its translation on the grounds that it is the word of God. Islamic doctrine teaches that the Qur’an is the miracle of Muhammad and neither its composition nor its contents can be imitated. So there are millions of people who cannot perceive this miracle (because they don’t know Arabic) and the English and other translations they will tell you are not accurate. The only accurate translation is the original translation in Arabic. So if the Qur’an is the final and last revelation from God to man, and the only translation considered accurate and pure is in Arabic, pray tell; how on earth will anyone who does not speak Arabic, understand what God revealed?

    They will tell you that the Bible we have is not the original Bible, it is corrupt, contains contradictions and it is not an accurate representation of Jesus Christ. They maintain that Jesus never really died on the cross and therefore the resurrection was a fabrication. But how does one know whether a thing is truthful without knowing whether or not there is a unit by which to measure it? There is no point of reference regarding the claim by Islam that the Bible is corrupt. We do not have the supposedly pure, original Bible with which we can compare our supposed corrupt version. If we are simply told that what we have is wrong based on something that is never shown to us, we have a slight problem. I will tell you what it is like. It is like saying planet X is such-and-such distance from earth, I do not know the actual distance, but just take my word for it. As a postscript I should add that they will never tell you what was changed, when or by whom.

    The Qur’an was written about 6 centuries after Jesus Christ. But remember from the previous point, the original absolute was corrupted. But about 600 years later, we now have the latest and greatest revelation from God which means that B (Qur’an) succeeds A (Gospels, Scripture etc.). So B overrules A because A is corrupt. So if that is the way an absolute is overruled, what is to keep C from coming in 6 centuries from now and overruling B? This is exactly what Joseph Smith did when he founded Mormonism. The previous revelations as found in Christianity and Islam are “corrupt” and he has come out with the last and the greatest revelation and so on. If absolutes keep overruling absolutes without any point of reference and we can keep going on and on ad infinitum (or more like ad nauseam).

    They can freely debunk truths we hold about our Lord but you cannot do the same with the names or truths that are precious to them. We can be told in the Qur’an that Jesus never died (which is what is said), we can be told that it is blasphemy to claim that Jesus said he was the Son of God (but that is precisely what he said). In other words, all kinds of concepts that are treasured truths (the Incarnation, the Resurrection, Jesus’ deity) can be denied by Islam. But to even suggest that some treasured Islamic truth might not be true, is “deeply offensive” to Muslims. So, A is given the right to impugn what B is saying but B is not given the privilege of scrutinizing what A is saying. How can there be any dialogue?

    Israel still important to God

    Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, called for the complete annihilation of the nation of Israel: “Very soon, this stain of disgrace [Israel] will be purged from the center of the Islamic world.” The ruling party in the Palestinian government, Hamas (official name: the Islamic Resistance Movement), recently reiterated their position which does not recognize Israel’s right to exist. These comments are not totally shocking. Israel’s location was ruled by Muslims for centuries. They intend to regain control and see Israel’s current position in the Middle East as temporary. But despite some men’s efforts to destroy Israel, she still has a very important part to play in God’s redemptive plan and will be protected.

    Salvation (of the entire world) “is of the Jews” (John 4:22), which Jesus fulfilled. In Romans 11:25, Paul writes, “that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in.” Gentiles refer to every non-Jewish person in the world. Once the Gentiles have “come in”, “Israel will be saved.” Regarding the task of taking the gospel to the world, Jesus made it abundantly clear to his disciples: Jews first, then the Gentiles (Acts 1:8).

    The Jews who reject the gospel will be inexcusable. But the Jews’ rejection of Jesus is also part of the plan (I am puzzled at this, but not entirely surprised. It is one of the reasons I believe Christianity, it is not something man could have invented). Concerning the unbelieving Jews, Paul writes, “I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy (Romans 11:11).” The salvation of the Gentiles will “provoke Israel to jealousy”. They (Jews) will want what we (Gentiles) have and so “be grafted in again (Romans 11:23).”

    The perfect plan, from a perfect God. No wonder Paul wrote, “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counselor? (Romans 11:33-34)”

    Thursday, February 23, 2006

    Thinking about a digital audio player?

    I know I am. But as with anything else these days, there is so much choice. Make sure to check out Digital Audio Player Review before dishing out your cash. Of course there is the Apple ipod, you can also get custom colour iPods from Colorware.

    You should also check out the Zen Vision M which has been getting rave reviews and seems to be better than the ipod. The X5 also seems to be a pretty good alternative to Apple's ubiquitous offering.

    And once you have your MP3 player, make sure to fill it up with some MP3s from:

    you get the picture ;)

    More article links

    Answering Islams has a series of articles which speak to the following topical issues:

    Is Islam Above Criticism?

    Are Pictures of Muhammad Really Forbidden In Islam?

    Islam and Human Rights

    The Spirit of Islam

    The Da Vinci Code resources

    There are two types of people in this world. Those who have read The Da Vinci Code and those who haven't. Which category are you in?

    Below are some links that "crack" Dan Brown's now infamous novel (the movie is due out later this year).

    Article link: Needed: Mature, Moderate Muslims

    Another interesting read on the now infamous cartoon controversy...

    Monday, February 20, 2006

    Truly wired from birth?

    There is a common misconception that there is a “gay gene” and homosexuals are born (wired) that way from conception. This is utterly false. There is absolutely no scientific evidence which shows that homosexuality is genetic. Concerning genetics and behaviour research, Dr. Joel Gelernter of Yale comments, “it’s hard to come up with many findings linking specific genes to complex human behaviors that have been replicated.” “...All were announced with great fanfare; all were greeted unskeptically in the popular press; all are now in disrepute” (Science 264:1687 (1994)).”

    No one is “wired that way”. Rather, research shows that homosexual behaviour is the result of a multiplicity of factors. It is interesting to note that the people who use that phrase consistently fail to cite any conclusive research to substantiate their claim. Myths abound in the area of unnatural sexual urges and relations. The National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality [http://www.narth.com/], is an excellent resource for debunking much of the popular misinformation in this area.

    The war for oil theory

    It was well said that the first casualty in war is the truth. The war in Iraq has resulted in a blitz from the foreign policy experts who substantiate that saying with their “war for oil” theory. A view which is also shared by the majority of Arabs. A recent public opinion survey showed that 75 percent of Arab respondents believe that the main motives of U.S. policies in the Middle East are “oil, protecting Israel, dominating the region and weakening the Muslim world”.

    It was recently reported that the current cost of the war in Iraq for the Bush administration was around ½ billion USD. A figure that is likely to climb to USD$1-2 trillion according to economics professor, Joseph Stiglitz, and Harvard budget expert Linda Bilmes. So we are to believe that the Americans are spending hundreds of millions, perhaps trillions in the long run, to gain control of Iraqi oil fields which are not worth anywhere near that amount? Really now.

    Depending on which study you believe, we have anywhere between 40-95 years worth of oil left. Therefore, as oil gets more scarce and expensive, alternative energy sources will become more attractive. Since 2001, the Americans have spent close to USD$10 billion on alternative energy sources. The oil age will eventually come to an end. As Sheik Yamani said, “… but not for lack of oil, just like the Stone Age came to an end, but not for lack of stone.” John Hawkins aptly sums up the oil for war theory this way, “It’s really nothing more than a bumper sticker slogan that through parrot-like repetition has managed to impress liberal partisans, people who don’t like Bush, and those who don’t really understand foreign policy.”

    Monday, February 13, 2006

    The word of God

    Jesus predicted the resilience of God’s word when he said, “Heaven and earth will disappear, but my words will remain forever” (Matthew 24:35). The Bible has survived amidst criticism, rationalism, and countless ridicule. Eighteenth century French philosopher Voltaire predicted the demise of the Bible in light of rationalism. Fifty years after he died, his old home in France was used as a storage and distribution center for the Geneva Bible Society.

    The Bible has been “banned, burned and bludgeoned with … animosity and scorn.” But why? John Calvin answers: “Whenever people slander God’s word… they show they feel within its power, however unwillingly or reluctantly.” Modern folk have an aversion towards God’s word because, “the word of God is living, and active, and sharper than any two-edged sword,… quick to discern the thoughts and intents of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12). It confronts everything that is evil within us and lays bare our soul before a mighty God. We shun it because Jesus is not politically correct enough and requires too high a standard of us to allow Him to shape modern society.

    To think that philosophy or science will eventually render God’s word irrelevant is imprudent. As Isaiah put it, “The grass withers, and the flowers fade, but the word of our God stands forever” (Isaiah 40:8).

    Christianity and pluralism

    A king leads several blind men to an elephant and asks them to describe it. The resulting descriptions are conflicting, because each blind man touches a different part of the elephant. The supposed moral is this, each religion only has a portion of the total truth and if we could overlook our disagreements and exclusive claims we would realize we are all “feeling the same elephant.”

    But as Lesslie Newbigin in, “The Gospel in a Pluralist Society” points out, “If the king were also blind there would be no story. The story is told by the king and it is the immensely arrogant claim of one who sees the full truth which all the world’s religions are only groping after.”

    The tolerance police will no doubt sentence you to sensitivity training if you insist that “your religion” is the only right way. But as G.K. Chesterton put it: “I won’t call Christianity my religion, because I didn’t make it up. God and humanity made it, and it made me.” Christians can respect the concept of religious freedom in an increasingly pluralistic society but we cannot be indifferent to the great commission and the eternal destiny of others. Our exclusive claim is not based on our finite perspective; but on the perspective of the King of Kings who knows everything from alpha to omega. You are free to reject his claim, but please, do not be mistaken about what he claimed: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

    Atricle link: How to write a letter to the editor

    Doug Groothuis has written 11 tips on getting your "letters to the editor published." It's a good read.

    STR bog post: Criticism vs. Intimidation

    There is a good entry in blogsphere from STR. The entry comments on the response of the media over the now infamous 12 cartoons. I find the whole western media response to this issue very hypocritical.

    Friday, February 10, 2006

    No laughing matter

    Contrary to what some would have us believe, not all Muslims are “deeply offended” by the now infamous cartoons. This response was offered by Danish Muslim, Naser Khader: “The imams should stop criticizing the cartoons and instead criticize the terrorists that cut the throats of innocent hostages… But on such occasions we never hear a word from them.” Similar sentiments have been echoed in “blogsphere” by other Muslim commentators.

    The most hypocritical aspect of this outrage, is the fact that an Egyptian newspaper published the same cartoons in October 2005 and not a peep was heard. The Arab European League has responded by publishing anti-Semitic and holocaust-denying cartoons on their website. And, a leading Iranian newspaper is holding a holocaust-denying cartoon competition (what’s good for the goose I suppose). After every terrorist attack, great care is taken to assure us that Islam is a religion of peace which has been “hijacked by a fringe element”. Yet, we hear nothing from peaceful Muslims condemning: the violent (sometimes deadly) cartoon protests, holocaust-denying comments and the call for Israel to be “wiped off the map” from the Iranian leader. Why the silence?

    Wednesday, February 08, 2006

    The secularization of our culture

    An irate caller recently took a moderator to task for even suggesting something Christian in the public square. What nerve, how dare anyone put forward anything from the religious realm as a valid idea in the “real world.” R.C. Sproul, John Gerstner and Arthur Lindsley have accurately captured the secular attitude toward Christianity: “No martyr’s blood is shed in the secular west. So long as the church knows her place and remains quietly at peace on her modern reservation. Let the babes pray and sing and read their Bibles, continuing steadfastly in their intellectual retardation; the church’s extinction will not come by sword or pillory, but by the quiet death of irrelevance. But let the church step off the reservation, let her penetrate once more the culture of the day and the … face of secularism will change from a benign smile to a savage snarl.”

    If knowledge is power then those who claim to only deal with “objective” knowledge will be able to dictate the affairs of the day and marginalize and silence groups who are judged to rely only on “blind faith and private opinion.” This will lead to an increasing secularization of society. Secular wants God out. And as G. K. Chesterton lamented, “Once people stop believing in God, the problem is not that they will believe nothing; rather, the problem is that they will believe anything.”

    What is love?

    Nowadays, “love” is egoistic instead of altruistic. This once noble virtue has degenerated into a “vague diffusion of kindly feeling.” We have succeeded in trivializing “a more excellent way.”

    As long as we subscribe to this trivial view of love, we will never fully understand divine love as personified by Jesus Christ. Traherne in Centuries of Meditation, II, 30, wrote the following on divine love: “Love can forbear, and Love can forgive … but Love can never be reconciled to an unlovely object … He can never therefore be reconciled to your sin, because sin itself is incapable of being altered; but He may be reconciled to your person, because that may be restored.” In John 15:13 we read, “Greater love hath no man than this, than a man lay down his life for his friends.” (John 15:13) Yet, while we were still enemies, Christ sweat blood, then died for us. Now THAT is love.

    Case of the misguided atheist

    There is an interesting case in Italy being brought against a priest who is being accused of unlawfully misleading the public by presenting Jesus of Nazareth in his parish newsletter as an historical figure. The accuser, a professed atheist, argues that, “Christ never existed, but is an invention of the Church.” He is claiming that the priest has violated an article under the Italian penal code, which sanctions people who mislead others. “Abuse of popular gullibility” is the actual term used in the penal code.

    It is really too late in the day to come to the public, furthermore the courts, with this nonsense. R. Scott Appleby, a professor of church history at Notre Dame writes, “there is more evidence of Jesus of Nazareth than there would be for many other historical people who actually existed. Not only did Jesus actually exist, but he actually had some kind of prominence to be mentioned in two or three chronicles.” There is also considerable extra-biblical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth from non-Christian writers. Jewish historian Flavius Josephus is considered by scholars to be the most important non-Christian source on Christ’s existence. There are also the writings of Pliny the Younger, who described a policy of executing Christians who refused to curse Christ. Tacitus, a contemporary of Pliny, also wrote of Jesus being executed under the authority of Pontius Pilate.

    C.S. Lewis once commented, the man who claims not to believe anything solely on the basis of the historical evidence would have to be content to know nothing all his life. Jesus of Nazareth existed, and the historical records of friend and foe alike attest to this fact. Christ, on the road to the villages around Caesarea Philippi, posed a most relevant question to this discussion: “Who do men say that I am?” The disciples responded, but Christ was silent on the conflicting reports concerning his identity. He responded only with the more probing: “But who do you say that I am?” (Mark 8:29, emphasis mine)

    The deadliest vice

    “It was pride that changed angels into devils; it is humility that makes men as angels.” – Saint Augustine

    In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis makes the following observation concerning pride, “There is no fault which makes a man more unpopular, and no fault which we are more unconscious of in ourselves. And the more we have it in ourselves, the more we dislike it in others.” We tend to think that people are proud of being wealthy, smart or beautiful. But that is not true. People are proud of being wealthier, smarter and more beautiful than others. If everyone was equally wealthy, smart or beautiful, there would be nothing to be proud about. It is the comparison that makes us proud, the pleasure of being above everyone else.

    The worse kind of pride though is not material, but spiritual. The devil simply delights in a proud Christian. If your religious life has you thinking (if even for a split second) that you are “good”, or worse yet, “better” than anyone else; you can be sure that you are being acted upon by the devil himself. The real test of being in the presence of God is this: you either see yourself as insignificant in comparison to His majesty, or you completely forget about yourself altogether. It should therefore come as no surprise that Scripture is replete with warnings against pride. Proverbs 16:18 tells us, “Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.” The Lord tells us to, “learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart.” (Matthew 11:29) The antidote for pride, is humility. Humility does mean having a low opinion of oneself. It can simply be thought of as pride in God: But “he who boasts, let him boast in the Lord.” (1 Cor. 10:17)

    Article links: Religious pluralism

    In Jesus the only Saviour, Greg explains why there is no such thing as a pluralist Christian.

    In Pluralism, Greg argues that: One of us must be wrong, at bare minimum. Maybe we both are. But one thing that we can never say is that we're both right.

    Wednesday, February 01, 2006

    Think on these things

    “People say they love truth, but in reality they want to believe that which they love is true.” - Robert J. Ringer

    “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult and left untried.” - G. K. Chesterton

    I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” - Mahatma Gandhi

    “If the world hates you, you should realize that it hated me before you. If you belonged to the world, the world would love you as its own. But because you do not belong to the world and I have chosen you out of it, the world hates you.” (John 15:18-19)