Thursday, August 17, 2006
Spurgeon Sermon: Search the Scriptures
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Hypocrisy with the problem of pain
In addressing the British Humanist Association (The Voltaire Lectures), Richard Dawkins maintains that there is no such thing as evil. We are just “dancing to our DNA” he says. Evil simply does not exist. On the other hand another antagonist of religious faith, clearly acknowledges the existence of evil by asking: “Where is God?” (who isn’t supposed to exist by the way) in light of human pain and suffering.
Truth be told, we do not judge pain and suffering on unprejudiced moral assessments, but on what is painful to us. We do not ask “Where is God?” when our behaviour is questionable. The reason is simple. We do not want God sniffing around in the darker recesses of our own lives. Gregory Koukl of Stand to Reason sums it up nicely: “We don’t really want God to stop us from hurting others; we only cry foul when He doesn’t stop others from hurting us.”
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, August 16, 2006
Does Iran have something in store for August 22?
During the Cold War, both sides possessed weapons of mass destruction, but neither side used them, deterred by what was known as MAD, mutual assured destruction. Similar constraints have no doubt prevented their use in the confrontation between India and Pakistan. In our own day a new such confrontation seems to be looming between a nuclear-armed Iran and its favorite enemies, named by the late Ayatollah Khomeini as the Great Satan and the Little Satan, i.e., the United States and Israel. Against the U.S. the bombs might be delivered by terrorists, a method having the advantage of bearing no return address. Against Israel, the target is small enough to attempt obliteration by direct bombardment.
It seems increasingly likely that the Iranians either have or very soon will have nuclear weapons at their disposal, thanks to their own researches (which began some 15 years ago), to some of their obliging neighbors, and to the ever-helpful rulers of North Korea. The language used by Iranian President Ahmadinejad would seem to indicate the reality and indeed the imminence of this threat. Read full article here...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Iran's president launches weblog
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Tuesday, August 15, 2006
Donate to the Global Fund
Posted by Adrian Sobers
bethinking.org
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The Zacharias Trust...
...exists to reach those who have objections and questions about the Christian faith, as well as to equip Christians to share their faith with confidence.
We seek to challenge those who shape the ideas of our culture with the credibility of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We do this through...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Pictures that lie
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, August 14, 2006
Introducing Windows Live Writer
Windows Live Writer is a desktop application that makes it easier to compose compelling blog posts using Windows Live Spaces or your current blog service.
Of course this post was made using the Live Writer application. It looks promising so far and can only get better.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, August 11, 2006
Abortion harmful to women
A recent editorial in the North American press argued that abortion is “just another operation.” Nothing could be further from the truth. Consider the following ways abortion can harm a woman’s mental and physical health:
- In her testimony before a Senate subcommittee in 2004, Dr. Elizabeth Shadigan testified that, “abortion increases rates of breast cancer, placenta previa, pre-term births and maternal suicide…Statistically, all types of deaths are higher with women who have had induced abortions.”
- After extensive research, Dr. Joel Brind, Professor of Endocrinology at City University of New York, concludes, “the single most avoidable risk factor for breast cancer is abortion.” Women who have abortions increase their risk of breast cancer by a minimum of 50 percent and as much as 300 percent.
- Post-abortion specialist David Reardon writes, “In a study of post-abortion patients only 8 weeks after their abortion, researchers found that 44% complained of nervous disorders, 36% had experienced sleep disorders, 31% had regrets, and 11% had been prescribed psychotropic medicine by their family doctor.” This study is significant since some women show no apparent effects from their abortions until years later.
Mother Teresa saw abortion, not only as harmful to women, but as “the greatest destroyer of love and peace.” This is what she had to say, “Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love but to use any violence to get what they want. If we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell people not to kill one another?” You tell me.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Mother Teresa on abortion
"But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself.
And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even His life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion should be helped to love, that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free-time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts.
By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems. And, by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world. The father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So abortion just leads to more abortion.
Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. This is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion."
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Thursday, August 10, 2006
Art, Music & Apologetics: An e4 Course (DVD)
Session Listing:
1. Lecture 01: Christian Apologetics
2. Lecture 02: Foundations
3. Lecture 03: History
4. Lecture 04: Art & Cultural Analysis
5. Interaction: Apologetics & Art
6. Lecture 05: Christian Worldview
7. Interaction: Culture
8. Lecture 06: Faith & Reason
9. Lecture 07: Post(modernity)
10. Interaction: History
11. Interaction: Theology
12. Lecture 08: Unbelief
13. Lecture 09: Homecoming
14. Interaction: Apologetics
15. Lecture 10: The Problem of Evil
16. Lecture 11: Reflecting on Evil
17. Lecture 12: Worldwide Apologetics
18. Interaction: Pain & Evil
19. Lecture 13: Jazz and Spirituality (Concert)
20. Lecture 14: Pluralism and Truth
21. Lecture 15: Worship
22. Interaction: Redemption
23. Lecture 16: Reflections
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Terror plot in final stages...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, August 09, 2006
Resources from RZIM
Q & A Volume IV
Truth?
What does it mean to be human?
Engaging Culture with Conversations that Count
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
Floating bed anyone?
Posted by Adrian Sobers
A good study Bible
Posted by Adrian Sobers
August mentoring letter from STR
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Help for a simple-minded letter
"It is a very simplistic critique of religion. I pray that God will give you wisdom in knowing which of his many accusations to respond to. "
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, August 04, 2006
Chesterton on "The Sceptic"
"Pride consists in a man making his personality the only test, instead of making truth the test. The sceptic feels himself too large to measure life by the largest things; and ends by measuring it by the smallest thing of all."
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Chesterton on atheism
"If there were no God, there would be no atheists."
Posted by Adrian Sobers
On "bloodshed in the name of religion"
One of the most frequent, and simplistic, arguments against religion is how much bloodshed is done in her name. People who use this argument ignore (or conveniently forget) that the 20th century has been the bloodiest century in world history. In the 20th century alone, more than 130 million people have died in the name of secular ideologies. Ideologies that have nothing to do with religion have been the cause of the most bloodshed. That is a fact.
The accusation that bloodshed was done “all in the name of Jesus” can only be a valid statement against our Lord, if He had in fact commanded His disciples to do such things. So all that is left, is for the “accuser of the brethren” to point out exactly where in the New Testament Jesus commanded His disciples to do such things. Although a more profitable exercise would be to actually read the New Testament properly.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
Comic book philosophy?
"God" as postulated by religion is an intellectual creation of man, and a purely contrived idea. And "theology" nothing more than comic-book philosophy.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
WordPress Web Hosting
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Francis Bacon on atheism
"Atheism is rather in the lip than in the heart of man."
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Beneath the surface
Beneath the surface, most embittered unbelievers just need, love – the most powerful apologetic. And love is no better personified as in the person Jesus Christ, of whom Paul writes: “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God's wrath through him! For if, when we were God's enemies, we were reconciled to him through the death of his Son, how much more, having been reconciled, shall we be saved through his life! Not only is this so, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received reconciliation” (Romans 5:8-11). There is eternal life and love in the Cross of Jesus Christ. The invitation of the psalmist is open, especially to embittered unbelievers: “Taste and see that the LORD is good...” (Psalm 34:8). And that’s taste; not think.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Mourinho wary of United
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Letter to the Editor: August 02, 2006
What makes me laugh the hardest is when churches and mosques and pilgrims and innocent people get blasted to smithereens. Apparently God does not protect His own. When you ask a cleric why this happens you are told: "God does not interfere in the free will of men." That's cool. But then we have the epitome of anomaly . . . a little later the same day you are called to prayer, to pray (example) for little Mary who is ill. We are told: "Come and join us in prayer for little Mary. Let us pray to our merciful Father in heaven that He will protect her during her operation and bring her safely through to good and enduring health." And Barbadians (and others) go right along with it. Lambs led to the slaughter. "
The letter, like so many of the writer's offerings on religion/philosophy, is full of fallicies but it does touch on some important points - free will, problem of evil, prayer and so on - and therfore warrants some kind of response. Hell hath no fury like this man rambling about religion. Funny thing is, for someone who doesn't believe in God, he sure spends a lot of time thinking and writing about him.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
1 Timothy 6:6-10 (NIV)
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Godlessness in the Last Days
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Doing what is good
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Titus 2:11-15 (NIV)
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, July 31, 2006
How to read the Bible
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The Supremacy of the Son of God
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Playstation 3 Resource Centre
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
Microsoft Office System 2007
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Microsoft confirms 'Zune'
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, July 24, 2006
A brief reflection on music
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Stem cell alternatives being ignored
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Primer on Hezbollah
Posted by Adrian Sobers
7 blunders
1. Wealth without work.
2. Pleasure with conscience.
3. Knowledge without character.
4. Commerce without morality.
5. Science without humanity.
6. Worship without sacrifice.
7. Politics without principle.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, July 21, 2006
Playstation 3 blurb
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, July 19, 2006
My current favourite song...
Is there anyone that fails
Is there anyone that falls
Am I the only one in church today feelin' so small
Cause when I take a look around
Everybody seems so strong
I know they'll soon discover
That I don't belong
So I tuck it all away, like everything's okay
If I make them all believe it, maybe I'll believe it too
So with a painted grin, I play the part again
So everyone will see me the way that I see them
Are we happy plastic people
Under shiny plastic steeples
With walls around our weakness
And smiles to hide our pain
But if the invitation's open
To every heart that has been broken
Maybe then we close the curtain
On our stained glass masquerade
Is there anyone who's been there
Are there any hands to raise
Am I the only one who's traded
In the altar for a stage
The performance is convincing
And we know every line by heart
Only when no one is watching
Can we really fall apart
But would it set me free
If I dared to let you see
The truth behind the person
That you imagine me to be
Would your arms be open
Or would you walk away
Would the love of Jesus
Be enough to make you stay
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Liberal Christianity is paying for its sins (article link)
Posted by Adrian Sobers
God's perfect timing - Romans 5:6-11
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, July 17, 2006
The absolute moral law
C. S. Lewis in his essay, “The Poison of Subjectivism”, had this to say: “To infer that whatever stands too long must be unwholesome is to be a victim of metaphor. Space does not sink because it has preserved its three dimensions from the beginning. Love is not dishonoured by constancy. Does a permanent unchanging moral code preclude progress? On the contrary, except on the presupposition of a changeless standard, progress is impossible. If absolute good is a fixed point, it is at least possible that we should get nearer and nearer to it, but if the terminal is as mobile as the train, how can the train progress towards it? Our ideas of ‘the good’ may change, but they cannot change either for the better or for the worse if there is no absolute and immutable good to which they can approximate or from which they can recede. We can go on getting a sum more and more nearly right only If one perfectly right answer is ‘stagnant’.”
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, July 10, 2006
Samaritan's Purse
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, July 07, 2006
Click and donate...
Remenber that...
“The Dead Sea is the dead sea because it continually receives and never gives.” — Anonymous
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Thursday, July 06, 2006
"The Trouble with 'X'"... by C.S. Lewis
On such occasions the outside friends usually says, ‘But why don’t you tell them? Why don’t you go to your wife (or husband, or father, or daughter, or boss or land-lady, or lodger) and have it all out? People are usually reasonable. All you’ve got to do is to make them see things in the right light. Explain it to them in a reasonable, quiet, friendly way.’ And we, whatever we say outwardly, think sadly to ourselves, ‘He doesn’t know “X”.’ We do. We know how utterly hopeless it is to make ‘X’ see reason. Either we’ve never tried it over and over again – tried it until we are sick of trying it – or else we’ve never tried because we saw from the beginning how useless it would be. We know that if we attempt to ‘have it all out with “X”’ there will either be a ‘scene’ or else ‘X’ will stare at us in blank amazement and say ‘I don’t know what on earth you’re talking about’; or else (which is perhaps worse of all) ‘X’ will quite agree with us and promise to turn over a new leaf and put everything on new footing – and then, twenty-four hours later, will be exactly the same as ‘X’ has always been.
You know, in fact, that any attempt to talk things over with ‘X’ will shipwreck on the old, fatal flaw in ‘X’s’ character. And you see, looking back, how all the plans you have ever made always have shipwrecked on that fatal flaw – on ‘X’s’ incurable jealously, laziness, or touchiness, or muddle headedness, or bossiness, or ill temper, or changeableness. Up to a certain age you have perhaps had the illusion that some external stroke of good fortune – an improvement in health, a raise of salary, the end of the way – would solve your difficulty. But you know better now. The war is over, and you realize that even if you became a millionaire, your husband would still be a bully, or your wife would still nag or your son would still drink, or you’d still have your mother-in-law to live with you.
It is a great step forward to realize that this is so; to face the fact that even if all external things went right, real happiness would still depend on the character of the people you have to live with – and that you can’t alter their characters. And now comes the point. When you have seen this you have, for the first time, had a glimpse of what it must be like for God. For, of course, this is (in one way) just what God Himself is up against. He has provided a rich, beautiful world for people to live in. He has given them intelligence to show them how it can be used, and conscience to show them how it ought to be used. He has contrived that the things they need for their biological life (food, drink, rest, sleep, exercise) should be positively delightful to them. And, having done all this, He then sees all His plans spoiled – just as our little plans are spoiled – by the crookedness of the people themselves. All the things He has given them to be happy they turn into occasions for quarrelling and jealousy, and excess and hoarding, and tomfoolery.
You may say that it is very different for God because He could, if He pleased, alter people’s characters, and we can’t. But this difference doesn’t go quite as deep as we may at first think. God has made it a rule for Himself that He won’t alter people’s character by force. He can and will alter them – but only if the people will let Him. In that way He has really and truly limited His power. Sometimes we wonder why He has done so, or even wish that He hadn’t. But apparently He thinks it worth doing. He would rather have a world of free beings, with all its risks, than a world of people who did right like machines because they couldn’t do anything else. The more we succeed in imagining what a world of perfect automatic beings would be like, the more, I think, we shall see His wisdom.
I said that when we see how all our plans shipwreck on the characters of the people we have to deal with, we are ‘in one way’ seeing what it must be like for God. But only one way. There are two respects in which God’s view must be very different from ours. In the first place, He sees (like you) how all the people in your home or your job are in various degrees awkward of difficult; but when He looks into that home or factory or office He sees one more person of the same kind – the one you never see. I mean, of course, yourself. That is the next great step in wisdom – to realize that you are also just that sort of person. You also have a fatal flaw in your character. All the hopes and plans of others have again and again shipwrecked on your character just as your hopes and plans have shipwrecked on theirs.
It is no good passing this over with some vague, general admission such as ‘Of course, I know I have my faults.’ It is important to realize that there is some really fatal flaw in you: something which gives the others just that same feeling of despair which their flaws give you. And it is almost certainly something you don’t know about – like what the advertisements call ‘halitosis’, which everyone notices except the person who has it. But why, you ask, don’t the others tell me? Believe me, they have tried to tell you over and over again, and you just couldn’t ‘take it’. Perhaps a good deal of what you call their ‘nagging’ or ‘bad temper’ or ‘queerness’ are just their attempts to make you see the truth. And even the faults you do know you don’t know fully. You say, ‘I admit I lost my tempter last night’; but the others know you’re always doing it, that you are a bad-tempered person. You say, ‘I admit I drank too much last Saturday’; but every one else knows that you are an habitual drunkard.
That is one way in which God’s view must differ from mine. He sees all the characters: I see all except my own. But the second difference is this. He loves the people in spite of their faults. He goes on loving, He does not let go. Don’t say, ‘It’s all very well for Him; He hasn’t got to live with them.’ He has. He is inside them as well as outside them. He is with them far more intimately and closely and incessantly that we can ever be. Every vile thought within their minds (and ours), every moment of spite, envy, arrogance, greed and self-conceit comes right up against His patient and longing love, and grieves His spirit more than it grieves ours.
The moment we can imitate God in both these respects, the more progress we shall make. We must love ‘X’ more; and we must learn to see ourselves as a person of exactly the same kind. Some people say it is morbid to be always thinking of one’s own faults. That would be all very well if most of us could stop thinking of our own without soon beginning to think about those of other people. For unfortunately we enjoy thinking about other people’s faults: and in the proper sense of the word ‘morbid’, that is the most morbid pleasure in the world.
We don’t like rationing which is imposed on us, but I suggest one form of rationing which we ought to impose on ourselves. Abstain from all thinking about other people’s faults, unless your duties as a teacher or parent make it necessary to think about them. Whenever the thoughts come unnecessarily into one’s mind, why not simply shove them away? And think of one’s own faults instead? For there with God’s help, one can do something. Of all the awkward people in your house or job there is only one whom you can improve very much. That is the practical end at which to begin. And really, we’d better. The job has to be tackled some day and every day we put it off will make it harder to begin.
What, after all, is the alternative? You see clearly enough that nothing, not even God with all His power, can make ‘X’ really happy as long as ‘X’ remains envious, self-centered, and spiteful. Be sure that there is something inside you which, unless it is altered, will put it out of God’s power to prevent your bring eternally miserable. While that something remains there can be no Heaven for you, just as there can be no sweet smells for a man with a cold in the nose, and no music for a man who is deaf. It’s not a question of God ‘sending’ us to Hell. In each of us there is something growing up which will of itself be Hell unless it is nipped in the bud. The matter is serious: let us put ourselves in His hands at once – this very day, this hour.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, July 03, 2006
Highly recommended
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The greatest conversation ever
"How can a man be born when he is old?" Nicodemus asked. "Surely he cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb to be born!"
Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, 'You must be born again.' The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit."
"How can this be?" Nicodemus asked.
"You are Israel's teacher," said Jesus, "and do you not understand these things? I tell you the truth, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man. Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.
This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, June 23, 2006
Salvomag.com...
...is the home of a new magazine. Their mission is stated below:
Critiquing art, music, film, television, and literature, interrupting mass media influence, and questioning the sanity of our consumerist lifestyle.
Countering destructive ideologies, replacing revisionist fictions with undeniable facts, nd paring away political correctness.
Debunking the cultural myths that have undercut human dignity, all but destroyed the notions of virtue and morality, and slowly eroded our appetite for transcendence.
Recovering the one worldview that actually works.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Thursday, June 22, 2006
New products @ RZIM
RZIM has some new products on their store front for Summer 2006. They include:
They look pretty interesting and will probably be added to my wish list. I have the following items on order from them:
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Heat get their first title...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, June 19, 2006
Free seminary courses online
The courseware posted on this site comprises an assortment of classes from Covenant Seminary's master's degree programs. Their selection is designed to provide a broad, foundational knowledge of the Scriptures as well as guidance for engaging a variety of ministry contexts through the study of church history, doctrine and practice.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Been a long time...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Currently reading...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Exciting time for sports fans...
The Cleveland Cavilers have shut-up Rasheed Wallace and the Pistions (at least for now) by shocking them on their home floor to take a 3-2 series lead back to Cleveland. If the Cavs pull off this upset it will be one of the biggest playoff upsets in history - Guaran-sheed!
And last but not least, my Spurs have lived to play at least one more game in Dallas after winning by one-point at home. Duncan hit is first 12 shots on his way to a 36 point, 12 rebound game.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Giving
I've been on this earth less than 30 years, and if there is one thing that is true, it is Acts 20:35: "It is more blessed to give than to receive." Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to let other people get the blessing.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
PS3: Inside and Out
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The Global Fund
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
Champs on the ropes
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, May 12, 2006
Top 20 Products @ RZIM
Check out the top 20 products people are ordering over at RZIM...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Article link: Going long for Jesus
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, May 08, 2006
Book wish: Exploring Reality
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Blog makeover
Posted by Adrian Sobers
7 more wins...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Tuesday, April 25, 2006
The Da Vinci Code Cracks
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, April 21, 2006
Blog link: Between two worlds
I came across and interesting link whilst over at the Stand to Reason blog. It's called Between two worlds: A Mix of Theology, Philosophy, Politics, and Culture. Make sure to check it out.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Evolution and morality
If evolution were true, virtues like mercy and love would not be acts of “virtue” that were freely chosen. They would be instinctive behaviours that were hard-wired for personal survival (a fact evolutionists readily admit). However, moral values involve chosen traits, not instinctual ones. This is most evident in the fact that we hold people morally responsible for free choices, not innate reactions. No one goes before the law court and argues, “Evolution, genetics and natural selection made me do it. Survival of the fittest and all that good stuff your honour.” If morality could be reduced to a naturalistic mechanism, it wouldn’t be morality anymore.
Darwin’s disciples fail to realize (or admit) that morality is not simply an account of what we do (descriptive), but a system explaining what we ought to do (prescriptive), and therefore evolution can’t explain it. If you are confused about origins, be sure to include Answers in Genesis and True Origin Archive in your research.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Atheism's bloody past
On the opinion that innocent blood has been shed in the name of religion, we should be honest enough to admit that atheism has an equally, if not, bloodier history. Stalin was an avowed atheist. In fact, Lenin (who read Friedrich Nietzsche) specifically selected Stalin because of his hatred of things religious. Hitler, who personally presented a copy of Friedrich Nietzsche’s writings to Benito Mussolini, gave Nietzsche’s theory of the “Superman”, a military interpretation. The “Superman” was an individual who overcame what Nietzsche termed the “slave morality” of traditional values, and lived according to his own morality. The rest as they say, is history. Nietzsche advanced the idea that “God is dead,” or, “traditional morality was no longer relevant in people’s lives”. Nietzsche and countless other ungodly philosophers have heavily impacted the Western mindset, so it is little wonder that we are in this moral quagmire.
If atheism is true then no moral law exists. If morality is espoused, it is merely utilitarian, pragmatic, subjective or emotive. The West is being rocked at her knees because we have lost the point of reference for the values which we are desperately trying to hold onto. We think we can survive without adhering to a transcendent moral law. Atheism’s bloody past cries out against the experiment.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Tuesday, April 11, 2006
The abolition of sin
This “translation” is a bit shocking but not totally surprising. Paul warned young Timothy about this, “For the time will come when people will not put up with healthy doctrine but with itching ears will surround themselves with teachers who cater to their own needs” (2 Timothy 4:3). We can sugar coat sin and psychoanalyze ourselves until the cows come home. But we should also remember the prophet Isaiah’s words: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! (Isaiah 5:20)”
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, March 20, 2006
Blog break
CD301 - The Harvard Veritas Forum
CD308 - Engaging Culture With Conversations That Count
CD212 - Is There Meaning in Evil & Suffering?
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, March 06, 2006
The problem with Christianity
The world is in a sense right to judge Christianity by its fruits. The Lord himself was most severe when he dealt with the religious leaders of his day who should have known better and judgement must begin at the house of God (1 Peter 4:17) if it is to being at all. But the world should be careful in her judging of Christendom. It tends to give unbelievers a false sense of security outside of Christ. One is left to think they can point out a couple of “hypocritical Christians”, make the case that they were “nicer” or “more virtuous” and all will be well. But it won’t be. Ultimately, each of us will be judged individually on our acceptance or rejection of Christ. In the words of Christ, “For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. (John 3:17-18)”
To be content to live outside of Christ and point to Christians who behave more like the devil himself is to do a great disservice to your soul. In the parable of the weeds and the field, the weeds and the wheat had to grow together lest the servants pulled out some of the wheat with the weeds. So it is in Christendom, the weeds and the wheat must grow together. But at the end of the age, the Lord will “send his angels to gather from his kingdom everything that causes others to sin and those who practice lawlessness and they will throw them into a blazing furnace.” Literally.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The missing link
Jesus Christ is the “missing link” and once man links us with him, then the “next stage of evolution” can begin. Only then can man begin the long, arduous process of becoming what he was always intended to be – a new creature in Christ Jesus. Who ever said evolution and Christianity were incompatible?
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, February 27, 2006
No ordinary man
In Mark 2:7, the scribes and the religious teachers asked, “Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?” In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis writes, “Now unless the speaker is God, this is really so preposterous as to be comic. We can all understand how a man forgives offences against himself. You tread on my toes and I forgive you, you steal my money and I forgive you. But what should we make of a man, himself unrobbed and untrodden on, who announced that he forgave you for treading on other men’s toes and stealing other men’s money? Asinine fatuity is the kindest description we should give his conduct. Yet this is what Jesus did.” No ordinary man (in his right mind) can claim to forgive all sins. No ordinary man says, “Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world. I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins” (John 8:23-24). No wonder the people asked, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven? (John 6:42)” This is easily answered. Jesus Christ, is no ordinary man.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
God is just
The writer of Hebrews offers us a sobering reminder that God’s love and grace is not a license to do as we like. To those who trample God’s Son and insult the Spirit of grace, the dictum is this, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Hebrews 10:31).” Does God love you? Yes. Will He nonchalantly turn a blind eye to the transgression of His law? Absolutely not. Justice will be exacted, not because He is cruel, but because He is love; and perfect love always exacts justice.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Problems with Islam
Their prophet is supposed to be the last and final prophet to the entire world. He performed no miracles because he said there was no need for it. Yet the Qur’an is believed to be a miracle by Muslims, but the Qur’an is in Arabic. So unless one knows Arabic, one cannot perceive the miracle. What is even more troubling is the fact that a large number of Muslims in the world do not even speak (or understand) Arabic, so the Qur’an in its original language is not accessible to them. Nevertheless, Muslims have traditionally objected to its translation on the grounds that it is the word of God. Islamic doctrine teaches that the Qur’an is the miracle of Muhammad and neither its composition nor its contents can be imitated. So there are millions of people who cannot perceive this miracle (because they don’t know Arabic) and the English and other translations they will tell you are not accurate. The only accurate translation is the original translation in Arabic. So if the Qur’an is the final and last revelation from God to man, and the only translation considered accurate and pure is in Arabic, pray tell; how on earth will anyone who does not speak Arabic, understand what God revealed?
The Qur’an was written about 6 centuries after Jesus Christ. But remember from the previous point, the original absolute was corrupted. But about 600 years later, we now have the latest and greatest revelation from God which means that B (Qur’an) succeeds A (Gospels, Scripture etc.). So B overrules A because A is corrupt. So if that is the way an absolute is overruled, what is to keep C from coming in 6 centuries from now and overruling B? This is exactly what Joseph Smith did when he founded Mormonism. The previous revelations as found in Christianity and Islam are “corrupt” and he has come out with the last and the greatest revelation and so on. If absolutes keep overruling absolutes without any point of reference and we can keep going on and on ad infinitum (or more like ad nauseam).
They can freely debunk truths we hold about our Lord but you cannot do the same with the names or truths that are precious to them. We can be told in the Qur’an that Jesus never died (which is what is said), we can be told that it is blasphemy to claim that Jesus said he was the Son of God (but that is precisely what he said). In other words, all kinds of concepts that are treasured truths (the Incarnation, the Resurrection, Jesus’ deity) can be denied by Islam. But to even suggest that some treasured Islamic truth might not be true, is “deeply offensive” to Muslims. So, A is given the right to impugn what B is saying but B is not given the privilege of scrutinizing what A is saying. How can there be any dialogue?
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Israel still important to God
Salvation (of the entire world) “is of the Jews” (John 4:22), which Jesus fulfilled. In Romans 11:25, Paul writes, “that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in.” Gentiles refer to every non-Jewish person in the world. Once the Gentiles have “come in”, “Israel will be saved.” Regarding the task of taking the gospel to the world, Jesus made it abundantly clear to his disciples: Jews first, then the Gentiles (Acts 1:8).
The Jews who reject the gospel will be inexcusable. But the Jews’ rejection of Jesus is also part of the plan (I am puzzled at this, but not entirely surprised. It is one of the reasons I believe Christianity, it is not something man could have invented). Concerning the unbelieving Jews, Paul writes, “I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy (Romans 11:11).” The salvation of the Gentiles will “provoke Israel to jealousy”. They (Jews) will want what we (Gentiles) have and so “be grafted in again (Romans 11:23).”
The perfect plan, from a perfect God. No wonder Paul wrote, “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out! For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counselor? (Romans 11:33-34)”
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Thinking about a digital audio player?
And once you have your MP3 player, make sure to fill it up with some MP3s from:
you get the picture ;)
Posted by Adrian Sobers
More article links
Answering Islams has a series of articles which speak to the following topical issues:
Is Islam Above Criticism?
Are Pictures of Muhammad Really Forbidden In Islam?
Islam and Human Rights
The Spirit of Islam
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The Da Vinci Code resources
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Article link: Needed: Mature, Moderate Muslims
Another interesting read on the now infamous cartoon controversy...
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, February 20, 2006
Truly wired from birth?
No one is “wired that way”. Rather, research shows that homosexual behaviour is the result of a multiplicity of factors. It is interesting to note that the people who use that phrase consistently fail to cite any conclusive research to substantiate their claim. Myths abound in the area of unnatural sexual urges and relations. The National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality [http://www.narth.com/], is an excellent resource for debunking much of the popular misinformation in this area.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The war for oil theory
It was recently reported that the current cost of the war in Iraq for the Bush administration was around ½ billion USD. A figure that is likely to climb to USD$1-2 trillion according to economics professor, Joseph Stiglitz, and Harvard budget expert Linda Bilmes. So we are to believe that the Americans are spending hundreds of millions, perhaps trillions in the long run, to gain control of Iraqi oil fields which are not worth anywhere near that amount? Really now.
Depending on which study you believe, we have anywhere between 40-95 years worth of oil left. Therefore, as oil gets more scarce and expensive, alternative energy sources will become more attractive. Since 2001, the Americans have spent close to USD$10 billion on alternative energy sources. The oil age will eventually come to an end. As Sheik Yamani said, “… but not for lack of oil, just like the Stone Age came to an end, but not for lack of stone.” John Hawkins aptly sums up the oil for war theory this way, “It’s really nothing more than a bumper sticker slogan that through parrot-like repetition has managed to impress liberal partisans, people who don’t like Bush, and those who don’t really understand foreign policy.”
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Monday, February 13, 2006
The word of God
The Bible has been “banned, burned and bludgeoned with … animosity and scorn.” But why? John Calvin answers: “Whenever people slander God’s word… they show they feel within its power, however unwillingly or reluctantly.” Modern folk have an aversion towards God’s word because, “the word of God is living, and active, and sharper than any two-edged sword,… quick to discern the thoughts and intents of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12). It confronts everything that is evil within us and lays bare our soul before a mighty God. We shun it because Jesus is not politically correct enough and requires too high a standard of us to allow Him to shape modern society.
To think that philosophy or science will eventually render God’s word irrelevant is imprudent. As Isaiah put it, “The grass withers, and the flowers fade, but the word of our God stands forever” (Isaiah 40:8).
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Christianity and pluralism
But as Lesslie Newbigin in, “The Gospel in a Pluralist Society” points out, “If the king were also blind there would be no story. The story is told by the king and it is the immensely arrogant claim of one who sees the full truth which all the world’s religions are only groping after.”
The tolerance police will no doubt sentence you to sensitivity training if you insist that “your religion” is the only right way. But as G.K. Chesterton put it: “I won’t call Christianity my religion, because I didn’t make it up. God and humanity made it, and it made me.” Christians can respect the concept of religious freedom in an increasingly pluralistic society but we cannot be indifferent to the great commission and the eternal destiny of others. Our exclusive claim is not based on our finite perspective; but on the perspective of the King of Kings who knows everything from alpha to omega. You are free to reject his claim, but please, do not be mistaken about what he claimed: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Atricle link: How to write a letter to the editor
Doug Groothuis has written 11 tips on getting your "letters to the editor published." It's a good read.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
STR bog post: Criticism vs. Intimidation
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Friday, February 10, 2006
No laughing matter
The most hypocritical aspect of this outrage, is the fact that an Egyptian newspaper published the same cartoons in October 2005 and not a peep was heard. The Arab European League has responded by publishing anti-Semitic and holocaust-denying cartoons on their website. And, a leading Iranian newspaper is holding a holocaust-denying cartoon competition (what’s good for the goose I suppose). After every terrorist attack, great care is taken to assure us that Islam is a religion of peace which has been “hijacked by a fringe element”. Yet, we hear nothing from peaceful Muslims condemning: the violent (sometimes deadly) cartoon protests, holocaust-denying comments and the call for Israel to be “wiped off the map” from the Iranian leader. Why the silence?
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
The secularization of our culture
If knowledge is power then those who claim to only deal with “objective” knowledge will be able to dictate the affairs of the day and marginalize and silence groups who are judged to rely only on “blind faith and private opinion.” This will lead to an increasing secularization of society. Secular wants God out. And as G. K. Chesterton lamented, “Once people stop believing in God, the problem is not that they will believe nothing; rather, the problem is that they will believe anything.”
Posted by Adrian Sobers
What is love?
As long as we subscribe to this trivial view of love, we will never fully understand divine love as personified by Jesus Christ. Traherne in Centuries of Meditation, II, 30, wrote the following on divine love: “Love can forbear, and Love can forgive … but Love can never be reconciled to an unlovely object … He can never therefore be reconciled to your sin, because sin itself is incapable of being altered; but He may be reconciled to your person, because that may be restored.” In John 15:13 we read, “Greater love hath no man than this, than a man lay down his life for his friends.” (John 15:13) Yet, while we were still enemies, Christ sweat blood, then died for us. Now THAT is love.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Case of the misguided atheist
It is really too late in the day to come to the public, furthermore the courts, with this nonsense. R. Scott Appleby, a professor of church history at Notre Dame writes, “there is more evidence of Jesus of Nazareth than there would be for many other historical people who actually existed. Not only did Jesus actually exist, but he actually had some kind of prominence to be mentioned in two or three chronicles.” There is also considerable extra-biblical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth from non-Christian writers. Jewish historian Flavius Josephus is considered by scholars to be the most important non-Christian source on Christ’s existence. There are also the writings of Pliny the Younger, who described a policy of executing Christians who refused to curse Christ. Tacitus, a contemporary of Pliny, also wrote of Jesus being executed under the authority of Pontius Pilate.
C.S. Lewis once commented, the man who claims not to believe anything solely on the basis of the historical evidence would have to be content to know nothing all his life. Jesus of Nazareth existed, and the historical records of friend and foe alike attest to this fact. Christ, on the road to the villages around Caesarea Philippi, posed a most relevant question to this discussion: “Who do men say that I am?” The disciples responded, but Christ was silent on the conflicting reports concerning his identity. He responded only with the more probing: “But who do you say that I am?” (Mark 8:29, emphasis mine)
Posted by Adrian Sobers
The deadliest vice
In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis makes the following observation concerning pride, “There is no fault which makes a man more unpopular, and no fault which we are more unconscious of in ourselves. And the more we have it in ourselves, the more we dislike it in others.” We tend to think that people are proud of being wealthy, smart or beautiful. But that is not true. People are proud of being wealthier, smarter and more beautiful than others. If everyone was equally wealthy, smart or beautiful, there would be nothing to be proud about. It is the comparison that makes us proud, the pleasure of being above everyone else.
The worse kind of pride though is not material, but spiritual. The devil simply delights in a proud Christian. If your religious life has you thinking (if even for a split second) that you are “good”, or worse yet, “better” than anyone else; you can be sure that you are being acted upon by the devil himself. The real test of being in the presence of God is this: you either see yourself as insignificant in comparison to His majesty, or you completely forget about yourself altogether. It should therefore come as no surprise that Scripture is replete with warnings against pride. Proverbs 16:18 tells us, “Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.” The Lord tells us to, “learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart.” (Matthew 11:29) The antidote for pride, is humility. Humility does mean having a low opinion of oneself. It can simply be thought of as pride in God: But “he who boasts, let him boast in the Lord.” (1 Cor. 10:17)
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Article links: Religious pluralism
In Pluralism, Greg argues that: One of us must be wrong, at bare minimum. Maybe we both are. But one thing that we can never say is that we're both right.
Posted by Adrian Sobers
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Think on these things
“The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult and left untried.” - G. K. Chesterton
I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” - Mahatma Gandhi
“If the world hates you, you should realize that it hated me before you. If you belonged to the world, the world would love you as its own. But because you do not belong to the world and I have chosen you out of it, the world hates you.” (John 15:18-19)
Posted by Adrian Sobers
